Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Absolute convergence
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Absolute convergence of integrals== The [[integral]] <math display=inline>\int_A f(x)\,dx</math> of a real or complex-valued function is said to '''converge absolutely''' if <math display=inline>\int_A \left|f(x)\right|\,dx < \infty.</math> One also says that <math>f</math> is '''absolutely integrable'''. The issue of absolute integrability is intricate and depends on whether the [[Riemann integral|Riemann]], [[Lebesgue integral|Lebesgue]], or [[Henstock–Kurzweil integral|Kurzweil-Henstock]] (gauge) integral is considered; for the Riemann integral, it also depends on whether we only consider integrability in its proper sense (<math>f</math> and <math>A</math> both [[Bounded function|bounded]]), or permit the more general case of improper integrals. As a standard property of the Riemann integral, when <math>A=[a,b]</math> is a bounded [[Interval (mathematics)|interval]], every [[continuous function]] is bounded and (Riemann) integrable, and since <math>f</math> continuous implies <math>|f|</math> continuous, every continuous function is absolutely integrable. In fact, since <math>g\circ f</math> is Riemann integrable on <math>[a,b]</math> if <math>f</math> is (properly) integrable and <math>g</math> is continuous, it follows that <math>|f|=|\cdot|\circ f</math> is properly Riemann integrable if <math>f</math> is. However, this implication does not hold in the case of improper integrals. For instance, the function <math display=inline>f:[1,\infty) \to \R : x \mapsto \frac{\sin x}{x}</math> is improperly Riemann integrable on its unbounded domain, but it is not absolutely integrable: <math display=block>\int_1^\infty \frac{\sin x}{x}\,dx = \frac{1}{2}\bigl[\pi - 2\,\mathrm{Si}(1)\bigr] \approx 0.62, \text{ but } \int_1^\infty \left|\frac{\sin x}{x}\right| dx = \infty.</math> Indeed, more generally, given any series <math display=inline>\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n</math> one can consider the associated [[step function]] <math>f_a: [0,\infty) \to \R</math> defined by <math>f_a([n,n+1)) = a_n.</math> Then <math display=inline>\int_0^\infty f_a \, dx</math> converges absolutely, converges conditionally or diverges according to the corresponding behavior of <math display=inline>\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n.</math> The situation is different for the Lebesgue integral, which does not handle bounded and unbounded domains of integration separately (''see below''). The fact that the integral of <math>|f|</math> is unbounded in the examples above implies that <math>f</math> is also not integrable in the Lebesgue sense. In fact, in the Lebesgue theory of integration, given that <math>f</math> is [[Measurable function|measurable]], <math>f</math> is (Lebesgue) integrable if and only if <math>|f|</math> is (Lebesgue) integrable. However, the hypothesis that <math>f</math> is measurable is crucial; it is not generally true that absolutely integrable functions on <math>[a,b]</math> are integrable (simply because they may fail to be measurable): let <math>S \subset [a,b]</math> be a nonmeasurable [[subset]] and consider <math>f = \chi_S - 1/2,</math> where <math>\chi_S</math> is the [[Indicator function|characteristic function]] of <math>S.</math> Then <math>f</math> is not Lebesgue measurable and thus not integrable, but <math>|f| \equiv 1/2</math> is a constant function and clearly integrable. On the other hand, a function <math>f</math> may be Kurzweil-Henstock integrable (gauge integrable) while <math>|f|</math> is not. This includes the case of improperly Riemann integrable functions. In a general sense, on any [[measure space]] <math>A,</math> the Lebesgue integral of a real-valued function is defined in terms of its positive and negative parts, so the facts: # <math>f</math> integrable implies <math>|f|</math> integrable # <math>f</math> measurable, <math>|f|</math> integrable implies <math>f</math> integrable are essentially built into the definition of the Lebesgue integral. In particular, applying the theory to the [[counting measure]] on a [[Set (mathematics)|set]] <math>S,</math> one recovers the notion of unordered summation of series developed by Moore–Smith using (what are now called) nets. When <math>S = \N</math> is the set of natural numbers, Lebesgue integrability, unordered summability and absolute convergence all coincide. Finally, all of the above holds for integrals with values in a Banach space. The definition of a Banach-valued Riemann integral is an evident modification of the usual one. For the Lebesgue integral one needs to circumvent the decomposition into positive and negative parts with Daniell's more [[Functional analysis|functional analytic]] approach, obtaining the [[Bochner integral]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)