Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Conspiracy theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====General public==== People who feel [[Empowerment|empowered]] are more resistant to conspiracy theories. Methods to promote empowerment include encouraging people to use [[analytical thinking]], [[Priming (psychology)|priming]] people to think of situations where they are in control, and ensuring that decisions by society and government are seen to follow procedural fairness (the use of fair decision-making procedures).<ref name="LewandowskyCook2020">{{cite book|last1=Lewandowsky|first1=S.|last2=Cook|first2=J.|title=The Conspiracy Theory Handbook|publisher=John Cook, Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University|year=2020|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BCGxzQEACAAJ|access-date=17 November 2021}}</ref> Methods of refutation which have shown effectiveness in various circumstances include: providing facts that demonstrate the conspiracy theory is false, attempting to discredit the source, explaining how the logic is invalid or misleading, and providing links to fact-checking websites.<ref name="LewandowskyCook2020"/> It can also be effective to use these strategies in advance, informing people that they could encounter misleading information in the future, and why the information should be rejected (also called inoculation or prebunking).<ref name="LewandowskyCook2020"/><ref name="ConnollyUscinski2019"/><ref name="LazicZezelj2021"/> While it has been suggested that discussing conspiracy theories can raise their profile and make them seem more legitimate to the public, the discussion can put people on guard instead as long as it is sufficiently persuasive.<ref name="Andrade2020"/> Other approaches to reduce the appeal of conspiracy theories in general among the public may be based in the emotional and social nature of conspiratorial beliefs. For example, interventions that promote [[analytical thinking]] in the general public are likely to be effective. Another approach is to intervene in ways that decrease [[negative emotion]]s, and specifically to improve feelings of personal hope and empowerment.<ref name="van ProoijenDouglas2018">{{cite journal|last1=van Prooijen|first1=Jan-Willem|last2=Douglas|first2=Karen M.|title=Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain|journal=European Journal of Social Psychology|volume=48|issue=7|year=2018|pages=897β908|doi=10.1002/ejsp.2530|pmid=30555188|pmc=6282974}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)