Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Dissection
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Alternatives==<!--Virtual dissection links to here--> Some alternatives to dissection may present educational advantages over the use of animal cadavers, while eliminating perceived ethical issues.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Balcombe |first=Jonathan |date=2001 |title=Dissection: The Scientific Case for Alternatives |url=http://animalstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=acwp_arte |journal=Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=117β126 |doi= 10.1207/S15327604JAWS0402_3|s2cid=143465900 |access-date=15 February 2016|url-access=subscription }}</ref> These alternatives include computer programs, lectures, three dimensional models, films, and other forms of technology. <!--The following may belong to a different section, not here-->Concern for animal welfare is often at the root of objections to animal dissection.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Stainsstreet |first1=M |last2=Spofforth |first2=N |last3=Williams |first3=T |title=Attitudes of undergraduate students to the uses of animals |journal=Studies in Higher Education |volume=18 |date=1993 |issue=2 |pages=177β196 |doi=10.1080/03075079312331382359 }}</ref> Studies show that some students reluctantly participate in animal dissection out of fear of real or perceived punishment or ostracism from their teachers and peers, and many do not speak up about their ethical objections.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Oakley |first1=J |title=Dissection and choice in the science classroom: student experiences, teacher responses, and a critical analysis of the right to refuse. |journal=Journal of Teaching and Learning |volume=8 |date=2012 |issue=2 |doi=10.22329/jtl.v8i2.3349 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Oakley |first1=J |title="I didn't feel right about animal dissection": Dissection objectors share their science class experiences. |journal=Society & Animals |volume=21 |date=2013 |issue=1 |pages=360β378 |doi=10.1163/15685306-12341267 }}</ref> One alternative to the use of cadavers is computer technology. At [[Stanford Medical School]], software combines X-ray, ultrasound and MRI imaging for display on a screen as large as a body on a table.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=White |first=Tracie |date=2011 |title=Body image: Computerized table lets students do virtual dissection |url=http://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2011/05/body-image-computerized-table-lets-students-do-virtual-dissection.html |journal=Stanford Medicine: News Center |access-date=20 February 2016}}</ref> In a variant of this, a "virtual anatomy" approach being developed at New York University, students wear three dimensional glasses and can use a pointing device to "[swoop] through the virtual body, its sections as brightly colored as living tissue." This method is claimed to be "as dynamic as [[IMAX|Imax]] [cinema]".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Singer |first=Natasha |date=7 January 2012 |title=The Virtual Anatomy, Ready for Dissection |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/08/business/the-human-anatomy-animated-with-3-d-technology.html |work=The New York Times |access-date=15 February 2016}}</ref> <!--could describe [[3D Indiana]] here-->
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)