Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Impact factor
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Counterfeit impact factors=== Fake impact factors or bogus impact factors are produced by certain companies or individuals.<ref name=fake>{{cite journal |vauthors=Jalalian M |title=The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them |journal=Electronic Physician |volume=7 |issue=2 |pages=1069β72 |year=2015 |pmid=26120416 |pmc=4477767 |doi=10.14661/2015.1069-1072}}</ref> According to an article published in the ''Electronic Physician'', these include Global Impact Factor, Citefactor, and Universal Impact Factor.<ref name="fake"/> [[Jeffrey Beall]] maintained a list of such misleading metrics.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://scholarlyoa.com/other-pages/misleading-metrics/ |title=Misleading Metrics |work=Scholarly Open Access |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170111172311/https://scholarlyoa.com/other-pages/misleading-metrics/ |archive-date=2017-01-11}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://beallslist.net/misleading-metrics/ |title=Misleading Metrics β Beall's List}}</ref> Another deceitful practice is reporting "alternative impact factors", calculated as the average number of citations per article using [[citation indices]] other than JCR such as [[Google Scholar]] (e.g., "Google-based Journal Impact Factor") or [[Microsoft Academic]].<ref name="XiaSmith2018">{{cite journal |vauthors=Xia J, Smith MP |title=Alternative journal impact factors in open access publishing |journal=Learned Publishing |volume=31 |issue=4 |year=2018 |pages=403β411 |issn=0953-1513 |doi=10.1002/leap.1200 |doi-access=free}}</ref> False impact factors are often used by [[predatory publishers]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://scholarlyoa.com/tag/fake-impact-factors/ |title=Scholarly Open-Access β Fake impact factors |vauthors=Beall J |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160321063637/https://scholarlyoa.com/tag/fake-impact-factors/ |archive-date=2016-03-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite report |title=Discussion document: Predatory Publishing |publisher=Committee on Publication Ethics |date=2019-11-01 |doi=10.24318/cope.2019.3.6 |page=|doi-access=free }}</ref> Consulting Journal Citation Reports' master journal list can confirm if a publication is [[journal indexing|indexed]] by the ''Journal Citation Reports''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://mjl.clarivate.com/ |title=Master Journal List |website=Web of Science Group |publisher=Clarivate}}</ref> The use of fake impact metrics is considered a [[Red flag (idiom)|red flag]].<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ebrahimzadeh MH |title=Validated Measures of Publication Quality: Guide for Novice Researchers to Choose an Appropriate Journal for Paper Submission |journal=The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=94β6 |date=April 2016 |pmid=27200383 |pmc=4852052}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)