Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Learned Hand
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Influence== Hand authored approximately 4,000 judicial opinions during his career. Admired for their clarity and analytic precision, they have been quoted more often in Supreme Court opinions and by legal scholars than those of any other lower-court judge.<ref name="SV" /> Both Hand's dissent in ''[[United States v. Kennerley]]''<ref name="Kenn" /> and his ruling in ''[[United States v. Levine]]''<ref>''United States v. Levine'', 83 F.2d 156 (2d Cir. 1936); see also ''[[United States v. One Book Entitled Ulysses by James Joyce|United States v. One Book Called Ulysses]]'', 72 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1934), in which a trial court decision by Judge [[John M. Woolsey]] was affirmed by a Second Circuit panel including Hand.</ref> have often been cited in obscenity cases.<ref>{{Harvnb|Griffith| 1973| p=157}}; {{Harvnb|Gunther|1994|p=149}}</ref> Hand's view that literary works should be judged as a whole and in relation to their intended readership is now accepted in American law. His use of historical data to gauge [[legislative intent]] has become a widespread practice. According to [[Archibald Cox]]: "The opinions of Judge Hand have had significant influence both in breaking down the restrictions imposed by the dry literalism of conservative tradition and in showing how to use with sympathetic understanding the information afforded by the legislative and administrative processes."<ref>Qtd. in {{Harvnb|Griffith| 1973| p=174}}</ref> Hand's decision in the 1917 ''Masses'' case influenced [[Zechariah Chafee]]'s widely read book, ''Freedom of Speech'' (1920). In his dedication, Chafee wrote, "[Hand] during the turmoil of war courageously maintained the traditions of English-speaking freedom and gave it new clearness and strength for the wiser years to come."<ref>{{Harvnb|Schick|1970| p=178}}</ref> Learned Hand played a key role in the interpretation of new [[federal crime]] laws in the period following the passing of the U.S. Criminal Code in 1909.<ref>{{Harvnb|Griffith| 1973| p=35}}</ref> In a series of judicial opinions and speeches, he opposed excessive concern for criminal defendants, and wrote "Our dangers do not lie in too little tenderness to the accused. Our procedure has always been haunted by the ghost of the innocent man convicted. ... What we need to fear is the archaic formalism and watery sentiment that obstructs, delays and defeats the prosecution of crime." He insisted that [[Harmless error|harmless trial errors]] should not automatically lead to a reversal on appeal. Hand balanced these views with important decisions to protect a defendant's constitutional rights concerning unreasonable searches, forced confessions and cumulative sentences.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gunther|1994|pp=304–305, 532–533}}; {{Harvnb|Judd|1947|pp=405–422}}</ref> His opinions have also proved lasting in fields of [[commercial law]]. Law students studying [[torts]] often encounter Hand's 1947 decision for ''[[United States v. Carroll Towing Co.]]'',<ref>''[[United States v. Carroll Towing Co.]]'', 159 F.2d 169 (2nd Cir. 1947)</ref> which gave a formula for determining liability in cases of [[negligence]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Weinrib|1995|p=48. Hand proposed that the defendant's duty is a function of three variables: the probability of an accident's occurring, the gravity of loss if it should occur, and burden of adequate precautions. He expressed this in the algebraic formula: "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends on whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., where B is less than PL." See also [[Calculus of negligence]].}}</ref> Hand's interpretations of complex [[Internal Revenue Code]]s, which he called "a thicket of verbiage", have been used as guides in the gray area between individual and [[corporate tax]]es.<ref>{{Harvnb|Schick|1970|p=169}}</ref> In an opinion sometimes seen as condoning tax avoidance, Hand stated in 1947 that "there is nothing sinister in so arranging one's affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible".<ref>{{Harvnb|Griffith|1973|p=26}}</ref> He was referring to reporting of individual income through corporate [[Tax forms in the United States|tax forms]] for legitimate business reasons. In tax decisions, as in all statutory cases, Hand studied the intent of the original legislation. His opinions became a valuable guide to tax administrators.<ref>{{Harvnb|Griffith|1973|pp=26–30.}} See also {{Harvnb|Chirelstein|1968}}, "Learned Hand's Contribution to the Law of Tax Avoidance".</ref> Hand's landmark decision in ''[[United States v. Aluminum Company of America]]'' in 1945 influenced the development of [[Competition law|antitrust law]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Griffith|1973|pp=32–34}}; {{Harvnb|Schick|1970| pp=170–171, 188}}; ''United States v. Aluminium Company of America'', 148 F.2d 416 (2nd Cir. 1945). In this case, the Second Circuit took the place of the Supreme Court under a special statute, enacted after the Supreme Court lacked [[quorum]] in the case because of [[recusal]]s. Hand's opinion set the standard for future rulings.</ref> His decisions in patent, [[copyright]], and [[admiralty law|admiralty]] cases have contributed to the development of law in those fields.<ref>{{Harvnb|Schick|1970| p=188}}</ref> Hand was also a founding member of the [[American Law Institute]], where he helped develop the influential [[Restatements of the Law]] serving as models for refining and improving state codes in various fields.<ref>{{Harvnb|Griffith| 1973| pp=43–44}}; {{Harvnb|Gunther| 1994| pp=410–414}}</ref> One American Law Institute recommendation was to decriminalize sexual conduct such as adultery and homosexuality, for which reason the July–August 1955 issue of the [[Mattachine Society|Mattachine Society Review]], the magazine of the country's first nationwide homosexual organization, published a salute to Judge Hand featuring his photograph on the cover.<ref>''Mattachine Review'', Issue No. 4, July–August 1955, cover and p. 2.</ref> After Hand's lectures and publications became widely known, his influence reached courts throughout the country.<ref>{{Harvnb|Schick|1970| p=189}}</ref> On the occasion of his 75th birthday on January 27, 1947, ''[[The Washington Post]]'' reported: "He has won recognition as a judges' judge. His opinions command respect wherever our law extends, not because of his standing in the judicial hierarchy, but because of the clarity of thought and the cogency of reasoning that shape them."<ref>Qtd. in {{Harvnb|Gunther|1994|p=574}}</ref> To the wider public, who knew little of his legal work, Hand was by then a folk hero.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gunther|1994|p=550}}</ref> [[Social scientist]] Marvin Schick has pointed out that this mythic status is a [[paradox]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Schick|1970|p=12}}</ref> Because Hand never served on the Supreme Court, the majority of his cases were routine and his judgments rooted in precedent. On Hand's retirement in 1951, Felix Frankfurter predicted that his "actual decisions will be all deader than the Dodo before long, as at least many of them are already".<ref>{{Harvnb|Schick|1970| pp=154, 187}}</ref> Working for a lower court, however, saved Hand from the taint of political influence that often hung over the Supreme Court. Hand's eloquence as a writer played a larger part in the spread of his influence than the substance of his decisions; and Schick believes that the Hand myth brushes over contradictions in his legal philosophy. Hand's reputation as a libertarian obscures the fact that he was cautious as a judge. Though a liberal, he argued for judicial restraint in interpreting the Constitution, and regarded the advancement of civil liberties as a task for the legislature, not the courts. In his 1958 Holmes Lectures, for example, he voiced doubts about the constitutionality of the [[Warren Court]]'s [[civil rights]] rulings.<ref>{{Harvnb|Schick|1970| p=355}}; {{Harvnb|Auerbach|1977|p=259}}</ref> This philosophy of judicial restraint failed to influence the decisions of the Supreme Court during Hand's lifetime and afterwards. Finally, in an essay called ''Origin of a Hero'' discussing his novel [[The Rector of Justin|''The'' ''Rector of Justin'']], author [[Louis Auchincloss]] says the main character was not based on a headmaster—certainly not, as was often speculated, [[Groton School|Groton's]] famous [[Endicott Peabody (educator)|Endicott Peabody]]. "If you want to disguise a real life character," Auchincloss advised fellow novelists, "just change his profession." His actual model for the Rector of Justin was "the greatest man it has been my good luck to know"—Judge Learned Hand.<ref>''Origin of a Hero'', in {{Citation |title=Life, Law, and Letters: Essays and Sketches |last=Auchincloss |first=Louis |year=1979 |publisher=Houghton Mifflin |isbn=0-395-28151-2 |url=https://archive.org/details/lifelawletters00auch }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)