Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Loyalty oath
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Ohio==== In the March 2008 State of Ohio presidential primary, some people might have been required to sign a loyalty oath in order to vote. Voters who wish to switch their party affiliation on Primary Election Day and who are challenged are supposed to sign a statement "stating that the person desires to be affiliated with and supports the principles of the political party whose ballot the person desires to vote."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/3513.19 |title=Ohio Revised Code 3513.19 Challenges at primary elections |publisher=Codes.ohio.gov |access-date=2013-09-12}}</ref> The statement is signed under penalty of "election falsification." If the challenged person refuses to sign the statement under penalty of election falsification, he is given a provisional ballot.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/3513.20 |title=Ohio Revised Code 3513.20 Effect of challenge to voter at primary |publisher=Codes.ohio.gov |date=1981-10-20 |access-date=2013-09-12}}</ref> ''The Cleveland Plain Dealer'', among others, thus describes the nature of the statement and effect of "election falsification": Anyone who signs this loyalty oath, but does not intend to honor it, can be prosecuted for "election falsification", a fifth-degree felony.<ref name="The Plain Dealer">{{cite web |title = Parties shouldn't require loyalty oaths at the polls |url = http://www.cleveland.com/editorials/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1205224432165421.xml&coll=2 |date = 11 March 2008 |work = The Plain Dealer |access-date = 2008-03-25 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110607182602/http://www.cleveland.com/editorials/plaindealer/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fopinion%2F1205224432165421.xml&coll=2 |archive-date = 7 June 2011 }}</ref> The statute, however, describes the offense differently: "No person, either orally or in writing, on oath lawfully administered or in a statement made under penalty of election falsification, shall knowingly state a falsehood as to a material matter relating to an election in a proceeding before a court, tribunal, or election official, or in a matter in relation to which an oath or statement under penalty of election falsification is authorized by law..."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/3599.36 |title=Ohio Revised Code 3599.36 Election falsification |publisher=Codes.ohio.gov |access-date=2013-09-12}}</ref> Thus the requirement is, arguably, more a statement of current intent than a loyalty oath's promise of future support.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)