Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
MythBusters
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Name lawsuit == In January 2005, children's author and adventurer [[Bowvayne|Andrew Knight]] commenced legal proceedings in Australia against Beyond Productions, the producer of ''MythBusters'', alleging [[passing off]] in relation to the use of the name "MythBusters".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.smh.com.au/news/Opinion/Wheel-falls-off-serene-machine/2005/06/17/1118869093834.html|title=Wheel falls off serene machine (Here comes the son)|first=Jeni|last=Porter|newspaper=[[Sydney Morning Herald]]|date=June 17, 2005|access-date=October 18, 2010}}</ref> Knight asserted that he had previously organized a team of "MythBusters" and had used the name continuously since 1988 in relation to pursuing myths, ghosts, monsters, goblins, and other such mysteries in an offbeat manner around the world. Knight wrote a series of self-published children's books under the banner "MythBusters" in 1991, 1993, and 1996.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Bowvayne|first=Andrew E.|title=MythBusters|publisher=[[Puffin Books]]|year=1996|page=144|isbn=0-14-037554-6}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Bowvayne|first=Andrew E.|title=Nut Cases (MythBusters S)|publisher=Elfshot Productions|year= 1993|page=[https://archive.org/details/mythbustersnutca0000bowv/page/96 96]|isbn=1-898412-00-6|url=https://archive.org/details/mythbustersnutca0000bowv/page/96}}</ref> In February 2007, the [[Federal Court of Australia]] dismissed Knight's claims against Beyond Productions.<ref>{{cite AustLII|FCA|70|2007|litigants=Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd |date=8 February 2007 |courtname=auto}}.</ref> A parallel action, relying on the same three books and a collection of short television appearances, was brought later that year in the Chancery Division of the High Court of England and Wales. Beyond Properties Pty Limited was again a defendant, as were two other Beyond companies and Discovery Communications Inc, the entity responsible for broadcasting the ''MythBusters'' program in the UK. These claims were also dismissed.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd & Ors, [2007] EWHC 1251 (Ch) {{!}} England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division), Judgment, Law, casemine.com |url=https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff76860d03e7f57eac34c |access-date=2023-12-07 |website=www.casemine.com |language=en}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)