Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Net (mathematics)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Relation to filters== {{See also|Filters in topology#Filters and nets}} A [[Filter (mathematics)|filter]] is a related idea in topology that allows for a general definition for convergence in general topological spaces. The two ideas are equivalent in the sense that they give the same concept of convergence.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.math.wichita.edu/~pparker/classes/handout/netfilt.pdf|title=Archived copy|access-date=2013-01-15|archive-date=2015-04-24|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150424204738/http://www.math.wichita.edu/~pparker/classes/handout/netfilt.pdf|url-status=dead }}</ref> More specifically, every [[filter base]] induces an {{em|associated net}} using the filter's pointed sets, and convergence of the filter base implies convergence of the associated net. Similarly, any net <math>\left(x_a\right)_{a \in A}</math> in <math>X</math> induces a filter base of tails <math>\left\{\left\{x_a : a \in A, a_0 \leq a\right\} : a_0 \in A\right\}</math> where the filter in <math>X</math> generated by this filter base is called the net's {{em|eventuality filter}}. Convergence of the net implies convergence of the eventuality filter.<ref name="Bartle">R. G. Bartle, Nets and Filters in Topology, American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 62, No. 8 (1955), pp. 551β557.</ref> This correspondence allows for any theorem that can be proven with one concept to be proven with the other.<ref name="Bartle" /> For instance, continuity of a function from one topological space to the other can be characterized either by the convergence of a net in the domain implying the convergence of the corresponding net in the codomain, or by the same statement with filter bases. [[Robert G. Bartle]] argues that despite their equivalence, it is useful to have both concepts.<ref name="Bartle" /> He argues that nets are enough like sequences to make natural proofs and definitions in analogy to sequences, especially ones using sequential elements, such as is common in [[analysis]], while filters are most useful in [[algebraic topology]]. In any case, he shows how the two can be used in combination to prove various theorems in [[general topology]]. The learning curve for using nets is typically much less steep than that for filters, which is why many mathematicians, especially [[Mathematical analysis|analysts]], prefer them over filters. However, filters, and especially [[ultrafilter]]s, have some important technical advantages over nets that ultimately result in nets being encountered much less often than filters outside of the fields of analysis and topology.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)