Editing Nilo-Saharan languages (section)

===Blench 2023===
By 2023,<ref>Blench, Roger. 2023. [https://www.academia.edu/104666399/In_defence_of_Nilo_Saharan_Saharan In defence of Nilo-Saharan].</ref> Blench had slightly revised the model for a deep primary split between Koman–Gumuz and the rest. Kunama and Berta are "provisionally" placed as the next to branch off, because they only partially share the features that unite the rest of the family. However, it is not clear if this is because they actually diverged early, or if they might have lost those features at a later date. For example, Berta shares plausible lexical cognates with the [[Eastern Jebel languages]] (East Sudanic) and its system of grammatical number "closely resembles" those of the [[East Sudanic languages]]; Kunama could be divergent "due to long-term interaction with [[Afroasiatic languages]]." Saharan–Songhay (especially Songhay) have seen substantial erosion of key characteristics, but this appears to be a secondary development and not evidence of early branching. "Core" Nilo-Saharan ("Central African" in Blench 2015) thus appears to be a typological rather than genetic grouping, though Maban is treated as a divergent branch of Eastern Sudanic; Kadu also seems to be quite close. The resulting structure is as follows:

{{clade
|1={{clade
|1=[[Koman languages|Koman]]
|2=[[Gumuz languages|Gumuz]]
}}
|2={{clade
|3=? [[Kunama languages|Kunama]]
|2=? [[Berta languages|Berta]]
|1={{clade
|1={{clade
|1=[[Saharan languages|Saharan]]
|2=[[Songhay languages|Songhay]]
}}
|2=[[Fur languages|Fur]]
|3=[[Central Sudanic languages|Central Sudanic]]
|4={{clade
|1=[[Kadu languages|Kadu]]
|2=[[Kuliak languages|Kuliak]]
|3={{clade
|1=[[Maban languages|Maban]]
|2=[[Eastern Sudanic languages|Eastern Sudanic]]
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}

Beyond the work of Colleen Ahland, Blench notes that the inclusion of Koman is buttressed by the work of Manuel Otero.<ref name=Otero/> The argument for Songhay is mostly lexical, especially the pronouns. Blench gives Greenberg credit for both East and Central Sudanic. Saharan and Songhay have some "striking" similarities in their lexicon, which Blench argues is genetic, though the absence of reliable proto-Sarahan and proto-Songhay reconstructions makes evaluation difficult.