Editing Political question (section)

===International law===

The [[International Court of Justice]] has dealt with the doctrine in its advisory function, and the [[European Court of Human Rights]] has engaged with the doctrine through the margin of appreciation.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Odermatt|first1=Jed|date=2018|title=Patterns of avoidance: political questions before international courts|url=http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/20820/1/Patterns%20of%20Avoidance.pdf|journal=International Journal of Law in Context|volume=14|issue=2|pages=221–236|doi=10.1017/S1744552318000046|s2cid=217026045}}</ref> The [[Court of Justice of the European Union]] has never explicitly addressed the political question doctrine in its jurisprudence, yet it has been argued that there are traces of the doctrine present in its rulings.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Butler|first1=Graham|date=9 November 2018|title=In Search of the Political Question Doctrine in EU Law|url=http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=LEIE2018020|journal=[[Legal Issues of Economic Integration]]|volume=45|issue=4|pages=329–354|doi=10.54648/LEIE2018020 |s2cid=158224219 |access-date=9 November 2018}}</ref>