Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Wide Area Augmentation System
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Drawbacks and limitations== For all its benefits, WAAS is not without drawbacks and critical limitations: * [[Space weather]]. All man-made satellite systems are subject to space weather and space debris threats. For example, a solar super-storm event composed of an extremely large and fast earthbound [[coronal mass ejection]] (CME) could disable the geosynchronous or GPS satellite elements of WAAS. * The broadcasting satellites are geostationary, which causes them to be less than 10Β° above the horizon for locations north of 71.4Β° latitude. This means aircraft in areas of [[Alaska]] or [[northern Canada]] may have difficulty maintaining a lock on the WAAS signal.<ref>Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University. [http://waas.stanford.edu/~wwu/papers/gps/PDF/LoPLANS02.pdf WAAS Performance in the 2001 Alaska Flight Trials of the High Speed Loran Data Channel] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060427104555/http://waas.stanford.edu/~wwu/papers/gps/PDF/LoPLANS02.pdf |date=2006-04-27 }}. Accessed June 12, 2006.</ref> * To calculate an ionospheric grid point's delay, that point must be located between a satellite and a reference station. The low number of satellites and ground stations limit the number of points which can be calculated. * Aircraft conducting WAAS approaches use certified GPS receivers, which are much more expensive than non-certified units. In 2024, Garmin's least expensive certified receiver, the GPS 175, had a suggested retail price of US$5,895. * WAAS is not capable of the accuracies required for Category II or III ILS approaches. Thus, WAAS is not a sole-solution and either existing ILS equipment must be maintained or it must be replaced by new systems, such as the [[local-area augmentation system]] (LAAS).<ref>Federal Aviation Administration. [http://gps.faa.gov/FAQ/faq-waas.htm WAAS FAQ] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060517035105/http://gps.faa.gov/FAQ/faq-waas.htm |date=2006-05-17 }}. Accessed June 12, 2006.</ref> * WAAS Localizer Performance with Vertical guidance (LPV) approaches with 200-foot minimums (LPV-200) will not be published for airports without medium intensity lighting, precision runway markings and a parallel taxiway. Smaller airports, which currently may not have these features, would have to upgrade their facilities or require pilots to use higher minimums.<ref name="AOPA_welcomes_WAAS" /> * As precision increases and error approaches zero, the [[navigation paradox]] states that there is an increased collision risk, as the likelihood of two craft occupying the same space on the shortest distance line between two navigational points has increased.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)