Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Coma
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Society and culture== Research by Eelco Wijdicks on the depiction of comas in movies was published in Neurology in May 2006. Wijdicks studied 30 films (made between 1970 and 2004) that portrayed actors in prolonged comas, and he concluded that only two films accurately depicted the state of a coma patient and the agony of waiting for a patient to awaken: ''[[Reversal of Fortune]]'' (1990) and ''[[The Dreamlife of Angels]]'' (1998). The remaining 28 were criticized for portraying miraculous awakenings with no lasting side effects, unrealistic depictions of treatments and equipment required, and comatose patients remaining muscular and tanned.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wijdicks |first1=Eelco F.M. |last2=Wijdicks |first2=Coen A. |title=The portrayal of coma in contemporary motion pictures |journal=Neurology |date=9 May 2006 |volume=66 |issue=9 |pages=1300β1303 |doi=10.1212/01.wnl.0000210497.62202.e9 |pmid=16682658 }}</ref> === Bioethics === A person in a coma is said to be in an [[Unconsciousness|unconscious]] state. Perspectives on [[personhood]], [[Identity (social science)|identity]] and [[consciousness]] come into play when discussing the [[Metaphysics|metaphysical]] and [[Bioethics|bioethical]] views on comas. It has been argued that unawareness should be just as ethically relevant and important as a state of awareness and that there should be metaphysical support of unawareness as a state.<ref name=":3" /> In the ethical discussions about disorders of consciousness (DOCs), two abilities are usually considered as central: ''experiencing well-being'' and ''having interest''. Well-being can broadly be understood as the positive effect related to what makes life good (according to specific standards) for the individual in question.<ref name=":1">{{cite book |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190280307.003.0011 |chapter=What is Good for Them? Best Interests and Severe Disorders of Consciousness |title=Finding Consciousness |date=2016 |last1=Hawkins |first1=Jennifer |pages=180β206 |isbn=978-0-19-028030-7 }}</ref> The only condition for well-being broadly considered is the ability to experience its 'positiveness'. That said, because experiencing positiveness is a basic emotional process with [[Phylogenetics|phylogenetic]] roots, it is likely to occur at a completely unaware level and, therefore, introduces the idea of an unconscious well-being.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last1=Farisco|first1=Michele|last2=Evers|first2=Kathinka|date=December 2017|title=The ethical relevance of the unconscious|journal=Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine|volume=12|issue=1|pages=11|doi=10.1186/s13010-017-0053-9|pmid=29284489 |pmc=5747178 |doi-access=free }} [[File:CC-BY icon.svg|50px]] Material was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License].</ref> As such, the ability of having interests is crucial for describing two abilities which those with comas are deficient in. Having an interest in a certain domain can be understood as having a stake in something that can affect what makes our life good in that domain. An interest is what directly and immediately improves life from a certain point of view or within a particular domain, or greatly increases the likelihood of life improvement enabling the subject to realize some good.<ref name=":1" /> That said, sensitivity to reward signals is a fundamental element in the learning process, both consciously and unconsciously.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Henry Adams: The Middle Years. By Ernest Samuels. (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1958. Pp. xiv, 514. $7.50.) and Henry Adams: The Major Phase. By Ernest Samuels. (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1964. Pp. xv, 687. $10.00.) |journal=The American Historical Review |date=January 1966 |doi=10.1086/ahr/71.2.709 }}</ref> Moreover, the unconscious brain is able to interact with its surroundings in a meaningful way and to produce meaningful information processing of stimuli coming from the external environment, including other people.<ref name=":2">{{cite book |doi=10.4324/9781315723983 |title=Neurotechnology and Direct Brain Communication |date=2016 |isbn=978-1-317-52959-0 |editor-last1=Farisco |editor-last2=Evers |editor-first1=Michele |editor-first2=Kathinka }}{{pn|date=December 2024}}</ref> According to Hawkins, "1. A life is good if the subject is able to value, or more basically if the subject is able to care. Importantly, Hawkins stresses that caring has no need for cognitive commitment, i.e. for high-level cognitive activities: it requires being able to distinguish something, track it for a while, recognize it over time, and have certain emotional dispositions ''vis-Γ -vis'' something. 2. A life is good if the subject has the capacity for relationship with others, i.e. for meaningfully interacting with other people."<ref name=":1" /> This suggests that unawareness may (at least partly) fulfill both conditions identified by Hawkins for life to be good for a subject, thus making the unconscious ethically relevant.<ref name=":2" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)