Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Labrador
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Boundary dispute== {{Further|Newfoundland and LabradorâQuebec border}} [[File:Old_Harry_oil_field_location_map-fr.svg|thumb|upright=1.2|The [[Old Harry oil field]], on the boundary between Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador]] In 1809, Labrador was transferred from Lower Canada to the Newfoundland Colony, but the inland boundary of Labrador had never been precisely stated.<ref name="marianopolis">{{cite web |year=2007 |url=http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/NFLDHistory/Quebec-NewfoundlandLabradorBoundaryIssue.htm |title=Labrador-Canada boundary |publisher=marianopolis |access-date=2008-03-20 |quote=Labrador Act, 1809. â An imperial act (49 Geo. III, cap. 27), 1809, provided for the re-annexation to Newfoundland of 'such parts of the coast of Labrador from the River St John to Hudson's Streights, and the said Island of Anticosti, and all other smaller islands so annexed to the Government of Newfoundland by the said Proclamation of the seventh day of October one thousand seven hundred and sixty-three (except the said Islands of Madelaine) shall be separated from the said Government of Lower Canada, and be again re-annexed to the Government of Newfoundland.' |archive-date=2014-03-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140318022522/http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.Belanger/nfldhistory/Quebec-NewfoundlandLabradorBoundaryIssue.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Newfoundland argued it extended to the height of land, while Canada, stressing the historical use of the term "Coasts of Labrador", argued the boundary was {{convert|1|smi|km}} inland from the high-tide mark. As Canada and Newfoundland were separate [[Dominion]]s, but both within the [[British Empire]], the matter was referred to the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]]<ref name=NYT>{{cite web |title=Oh, (No) Canada! |url=http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/10/oh-no-canada/ |work=Opinionator: Borderlines |publisher=The New York Times |access-date=July 15, 2012 |author=Frank Jacobs |date=July 10, 2012 |archive-date=July 27, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120727020303/http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/10/oh-no-canada/ |url-status=live }}</ref> (in London). Their decision set the Labrador boundary mostly along the coastal watershed, with part being defined by the [[52nd parallel north]]. One of Newfoundland's conditions for joining Confederation in 1949 was that this boundary be entrenched in the Canadian constitution.<ref name=NYT/> While this border has not been formally accepted by the Quebec government, the Henri Dorion Commission ({{Lang|fr|Commission d'Ă©tude sur l'intĂ©gritĂ© du territoire du QuĂ©bec|i=unset}}) concluded in the early 1970s that Quebec no longer has a legal claim to Labrador.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Rapids/3330/constitution/hden.htm |title=Henri Dorion debunks the Ten Great Myths about the Labrador boundary |work=Quebec National Assembly, First Session, 34th Legislature |date=October 17, 1991 |access-date=May 18, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091026232154/http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Rapids/3330/constitution/hden.htm |archive-date=October 26, 2009}}</ref> In 2001, Parti QuĂ©bĂ©cois cabinet ministers [[Jacques Brassard]] and [[Joseph Facal]] erroneously reasserted that Quebec has never recognized the 1927 border: {{blockquote|text= {{Lang|fr|Les ministres rappellent qu'aucun gouvernement quĂ©bĂ©cois n'a reconnu formellement le tracĂ© de la frontiĂšre entre le QuĂ©bec et Terre-Neuve dans la pĂ©ninsule du Labrador selon l'avis rendu par le comitĂ© judiciaire du Conseil privĂ© de Londres en 1927. Pour le QuĂ©bec, cette frontiĂšre n'a donc jamais Ă©tĂ© dĂ©finitivement arrĂȘtĂ©e.}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.saic.gouv.qc.ca/centre_de_presse/communiques/2001/saic_com20011031.htm |title=Le ministre des Ressources naturelles du QuĂ©bec et le ministre dĂ©lĂ©guĂ© aux Affaires intergouvernementales canadiennes expriment la position du QuĂ©bec relativement Ă la modification de la dĂ©signation constitutionnelle de Terre-Neuve |last1=Brassard |first1=Jacques |last2=Facal |first2=Joseph |date=October 31, 2001 |work=saic.gouv.qc.ca |publisher=Gouvernement du QuĂ©bec |language=fr |type=CommuniquĂ© |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050428091824/http://www.saic.gouv.qc.ca/centre_de_presse/communiques/2001/saic_com20011031.htm |archive-date=April 28, 2005 |url-status=dead |access-date=May 18, 2011 |name-list-style=amp}}</ref> [The ministers reiterate that no Quebec government has ever formally recognised the drawing of the border between Quebec and Newfoundland in the Labrador peninsula according to the opinion rendered by the London Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in 1927. For Quebec, this border has thus never been definitively defined.] }}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)