Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Pearson's chi-squared test
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Problems== The approximation to the chi-squared distribution breaks down if expected frequencies are too low. It will normally be acceptable so long as no more than 20% of the events have expected frequencies below 5. Where there is only 1 degree of freedom, the approximation is not reliable if expected frequencies are below 10. In this case, a better approximation can be obtained by reducing the absolute value of each difference between observed and expected frequencies by 0.5 before squaring; this is called [[Yates's correction for continuity]]. In cases where the expected value, E, is found to be small (indicating a small underlying population probability, and/or a small number of observations), the normal approximation of the multinomial distribution can fail, and in such cases it is found to be more appropriate to use the [[G-test]], a [[likelihood-ratio test|likelihood ratio]]-based test statistic. When the total sample size is small, it is necessary to use an appropriate exact test, typically either the [[binomial test]] or, for [[contingency tables]], [[Fisher's exact test]]. This test uses the conditional distribution of the test statistic given the marginal totals, and thus assumes that the margins were determined before the study; alternatives such as [[Boschloo's test]] which do not make this assumption are [[uniformly more powerful]]. It can be shown that the <math>\chi^2</math> test is a low order approximation of the <math>\Psi</math> test.<ref>{{cite book |author-link=Edwin Thompson Jaynes |last=Jaynes |first=E.T. |year=2003 |title=Probability Theory: The Logic of Science |publisher=C. University Press |isbn=978-0-521-59271-0 |page=298 |url=http://www-biba.inrialpes.fr/Jaynes/prob.html}} (''Link is to a fragmentary edition of March 1996''.)</ref> The above reasons for the above issues become apparent when the higher order terms are investigated.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)