Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Polygraph
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Alternative tests== Most polygraph researchers have focused more on the exam's predictive value on a subject's guilt. However, there have been no empirical theories established to explain how a polygraph measures deception. A 2010 study indicated that [[functional magnetic resonance imaging]] (fMRI) may benefit in explaining the psychological correlations of polygraph exams. It could also explain which parts of the brain are active when subjects use artificial memories.{{clarify |date=October 2016 |reason=What is an artificial memory?}}<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Bell | first1 = B. G. | last2 = Grubin | first2 = D. | year = 2010 | title = Functional magnetic resonance imaging may promote theoretical understanding of the polygraph test | journal = Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology | volume = 21 | issue = 1| pages = 52β65 | doi=10.1080/14789940903220676| s2cid = 144428132 }}</ref> Most brain activity occurs in both sides of the [[prefrontal cortex]], which is linked to response inhibition. This indicates that deception may involve inhibition of truthful responses.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Langleben | first1 = DD | last2 = Schroeder | first2 = L | last3 = Maldjian | first3 = JA | last4 = Gur | first4 = RC | last5 = McDonald | first5 = S | last6 = Ragland | first6 = JD | last7 = O'Brien | first7 = CP | last8 = Childress | first8 = AR | year = 2002 | title = Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study | journal = NeuroImage | volume = 15 | issue = 3| pages = 727β732 | doi = 10.1006/nimg.2001.1003 | pmid = 11848716 | s2cid = 14676750 }}</ref> Some researchers believe that [[mental chronometry|reaction time]] (RT) based tests may replace polygraphs in concealed information detection. RT based tests differ from polygraphs in stimulus presentation duration and can be conducted without physiological recording as subject response time is measured via computer. However, researchers have found limitations to these tests as subjects voluntarily control their reaction time, deception can still occur within the response deadline, and the test itself lacks physiological recording.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Verschuere | first1 = B. | last2 = Crombez | first2 = G. | last3 = Degrootte | first3 = T. | last4 = Rosseel | first4 = Y. | year = 2010 | title = Detecting concealed information with reaction times: Validity and comparison with the polygraph | journal = Applied Cognitive Psychology | volume = 24 | issue = 7| pages = 991β1002| doi=10.1002/acp.1601}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)