Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Animal cognition
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Natural categories ==== Many animals readily classify objects by perceived differences in form or color. For example, bees or pigeons quickly learn to choose any red object and reject any green object if red leads to reward and green does not. Seemingly much more difficult is an animal's ability to categorize natural objects that vary a great deal in color and form even while belonging to the same group. In a classic study, [[Richard J. Herrnstein]] trained pigeons to respond to the presence or absence of human beings in photographs.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH | title = Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon | journal = Science | volume = 146 | issue = 3643 | pages = 549β51 | date = October 1964 | pmid = 14190250 | doi = 10.1126/science.146.3643.549 | bibcode = 1964Sci...146..549H | s2cid = 11940233}}</ref> The birds readily learned to peck photos that contained partial or full views of humans and to avoid pecking photos with no human, despite great differences in the form, size, and color of both the humans displayed and in the non-human pictures. In follow-up studies, pigeons categorized other natural objects (e.g. trees) and after training they were able without reward to sort photos they had not seen before .<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Herrnstein RJ | year = 1979 | title = Acquisition, Generalization, and Discrimination Reversal of a Natural Concept | journal = Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes | volume = 5 | issue = 2| pages = 116β129 | doi=10.1037/0097-7403.5.2.116| pmid = 528881}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Bhatt RS, Wasserman EA, Reynolds WF, Knauss KS | title = Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. | journal = Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes | date = July 1988 | volume = 14 | issue = 3 | pages = 219β234 | doi = 10.1037/0097-7403.14.3.219}}</ref> Similar work has been done with natural auditory categories, for example, bird songs.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Tu HW, Smith EW, Dooling RJ | title = Acoustic and perceptual categories of vocal elements in the warble song of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) | journal = Journal of Comparative Psychology | volume = 125 | issue = 4 | pages = 420β30 | date = November 2011 | pmid = 22142040 | pmc = 4497543 | doi = 10.1037/a0024396}}</ref> Honeybees (''[[Apis mellifera]]'') are able to form concepts of "up" and "down".<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = AvarguΓ¨s-Weber A, Dyer AG, Giurfa M | title = Conceptualization of above and below relationships by an insect | journal = Proceedings. Biological Sciences | volume = 278 | issue = 1707 | pages = 898β905 | date = March 2011 | pmid = 21068040 | pmc = 3049051 | doi = 10.1098/rspb.2010.1891}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)