Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Central processing unit
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Clockless CPUs=== Another method of addressing some of the problems with a global clock signal is the removal of the clock signal altogether. While removing the global clock signal makes the design process considerably more complex in many ways, asynchronous (or clockless) designs carry marked advantages in power consumption and [[heat dissipation]] in comparison with similar synchronous designs. While somewhat uncommon, entire [[Asynchronous circuit#Asynchronous CPU|asynchronous CPUs]] have been built without using a global clock signal. Two notable examples of this are the [[ARM architecture family|ARM]] compliant [[AMULET microprocessor|AMULET]] and the [[MIPS architecture|MIPS]] R3000 compatible MiniMIPS.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last1=Martin |first1=A. J. |last2=Nystrom |first2=M. |last3=Wong |first3=C. G. |date=November 2003 |title=Three generations of asynchronous microprocessors |url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1246159 |url-status=live |journal=IEEE Design & Test of Computers |volume=20 |issue=6 |pages=9β17 |doi=10.1109/MDT.2003.1246159 |issn=0740-7475 |s2cid=15164301 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211203174748/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1246159/ |archive-date=2021-12-03 |access-date=2022-01-05|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Rather than totally removing the clock signal, some CPU designs allow certain portions of the device to be asynchronous, such as using asynchronous [[Arithmetic logic unit|ALUs]] in conjunction with superscalar pipelining to achieve some arithmetic performance gains. While it is not altogether clear whether totally asynchronous designs can perform at a comparable or better level than their synchronous counterparts, it is evident that they do at least excel in simpler math operations. This, combined with their excellent power consumption and heat dissipation properties, makes them very suitable for [[embedded computer]]s.<ref>{{cite conference |author1=Garside, J. D. |author2=Furber, S. B. |author3= Chung, S-H | title = AMULET3 Revealed | publisher = [[University of Manchester]] Computer Science Department | year = 1999 | url = http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/apt/publications/papers/async99_A3.php |book-title=Proceedings, Fifth International Symposium on Advanced Research in Asynchronous Circuits and Systems |doi=10.1109/ASYNC.1999.761522 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051210205845/http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/apt/publications/papers/async99_A3.php | archive-date=December 10, 2005 | url-status=dead| url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)