Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Spectral sequence
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== The spectral sequence of a double complex === Another common spectral sequence is the spectral sequence of a double complex. A '''double complex''' is a collection of objects ''C<sub>i,j</sub>'' for all integers ''i'' and ''j'' together with two differentials, {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|I}}}} and {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}}. {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|I}}}} is assumed to decrease ''i'', and {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}} is assumed to decrease ''j''. Furthermore, we assume that the differentials ''anticommute'', so that ''d''{{i sup|{{rn|I}}}} ''d''{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}} + ''d''{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}} ''d''{{i sup|{{rn|I}}}} = 0. Our goal is to compare the iterated homologies <math>H^\textrm{I}_i(H^\textrm{II}_j(C_{\bullet,\bullet}))</math> and <math>H^\textrm{II}_j(H^\textrm{I}_i(C_{\bullet,\bullet}))</math>. We will do this by filtering our double complex in two different ways. Here are our filtrations: :<math>(C_{i,j}^\textrm{I})_p = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } i < p \\ C_{i,j} & \text{if } i \ge p \end{cases}</math> :<math>(C_{i,j}^\textrm{II})_p = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } j < p \\ C_{i,j} & \text{if } j \ge p \end{cases}</math> To get a spectral sequence, we will reduce to the previous example. We define the ''total complex'' ''T''(''C''<sub>β’,β’</sub>) to be the complex whose {{prime|''n''}}th term is <math>\bigoplus_{i+j=n} C_{i,j}</math> and whose differential is {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|I}}}} + {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}}. This is a complex because {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|I}}}} and {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}} are anticommuting differentials. The two filtrations on ''C<sub>i,j</sub>'' give two filtrations on the total complex: :<math>T_n(C_{\bullet,\bullet})^\textrm{I}_p = \bigoplus_{i+j=n \atop i > p-1} C_{i,j}</math> :<math>T_n(C_{\bullet,\bullet})^\textrm{II}_p = \bigoplus_{i+j=n \atop j > p-1} C_{i,j}</math> To show that these spectral sequences give information about the iterated homologies, we will work out the ''E''{{i sup|0}}, ''E''{{i sup|1}}, and ''E''{{i sup|2}} terms of the {{rn|I}} filtration on ''T''(''C''<sub>β’,β’</sub>). The ''E''{{i sup|0}} term is clear: :<math>{}^\textrm{I}E^0_{p,q} = T_n(C_{\bullet,\bullet})^\textrm{I}_p / T_n(C_{\bullet,\bullet})^\textrm{I}_{p+1} = \bigoplus_{i+j=n \atop i > p-1} C_{i,j} \Big/ \bigoplus_{i+j=n \atop i > p} C_{i,j} = C_{p,q},</math> where {{nowrap|''n'' {{=}} ''p'' + ''q''}}. To find the ''E''{{i sup|1}} term, we need to determine {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|I}}}} + {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}} on ''E''{{i sup|0}}. Notice that the differential must have degree −1 with respect to ''n'', so we get a map :<math>d^\textrm{I}_{p,q} + d^\textrm{II}_{p,q} : T_n(C_{\bullet,\bullet})^\textrm{I}_p / T_n(C_{\bullet,\bullet})^\textrm{I}_{p+1} = C_{p,q} \rightarrow T_{n-1}(C_{\bullet,\bullet})^\textrm{I}_p / T_{n-1}(C_{\bullet,\bullet})^\textrm{I}_{p+1} = C_{p,q-1}</math> Consequently, the differential on ''E''{{i sup|0}} is the map ''C''<sub>''p'',''q''</sub> β ''C''<sub>''p'',''q''−1</sub> induced by {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|I}}}} + {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}}. But {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|I}}}} has the wrong degree to induce such a map, so {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|I}}}} must be zero on ''E''{{i sup|0}}. That means the differential is exactly {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}}, so we get :<math>{}^\textrm{I}E^1_{p,q} = H^\textrm{II}_q(C_{p,\bullet}).</math> To find ''E''{{i sup|2}}, we need to determine :<math>d^\textrm{I}_{p,q} + d^\textrm{II}_{p,q} : H^\textrm{II}_q(C_{p,\bullet}) \rightarrow H^\textrm{II}_q(C_{p+1,\bullet})</math> Because ''E''{{i sup|1}} was exactly the homology with respect to {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}}, {{mvar|d}}{{i sup|{{rn|II}}}} is zero on ''E''{{i sup|1}}. Consequently, we get :<math>{}^\textrm{I}E^2_{p,q} = H^\textrm{I}_p(H^\textrm{II}_q(C_{\bullet,\bullet})).</math> Using the other filtration gives us a different spectral sequence with a similar ''E''{{i sup|2}} term: :<math>{}^\textrm{II}E^2_{p,q} = H^\textrm{II}_q(H^{I}_p(C_{\bullet,\bullet})).</math> What remains is to find a relationship between these two spectral sequences. It will turn out that as ''r'' increases, the two sequences will become similar enough to allow useful comparisons.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)