Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Domain name
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Seizures=== <gallery caption="Seizure notices" style="float:right;"> File:Absolutepoker.png|[[Cereus Poker Network|absolutepoker.com]] File:Website seizure notice.jpg|channelsurfing.net File:Liberty Reserve seizure notice.png|[[Liberty Reserve|libertyreserve.com]] </gallery> In the early 21st century, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) pursued the [[Search and seizure|seizure]] of domain names, based on the legal theory that domain names constitute property used to engage in criminal activity, and thus are subject to [[Forfeiture (law)|forfeiture]]. For example, in the seizure of the domain name of a gambling website, the DOJ referenced {{uscsub|18|981}} and {{uscsub|18|1955|d}}.<ref name=abspoker1/>[https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-afmls/legacy/2015/04/24/statutes2015.pdf] In 2013 the US government seized [[Liberty Reserve]], citing {{uscsub|18|982|a|1}}.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Dia|first1=Miaz|title=website laten maken|url=https://kmowebdiensten.be/diensten/website-laten-maken/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220224636/https://kmowebdiensten.be/diensten/website-laten-maken/|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 20, 2016|access-date=8 December 2016|work=Kmowebdiensten|date=4 February 2010}}</ref> The U.S. Congress passed the [[Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act]] in 2010. Consumer Electronics Association vice president Michael Petricone was worried that seizure was a ''blunt instrument'' that could harm legitimate businesses.<ref name=cnet1/><ref name=hill1/> After a joint operation on February 15, 2011, the DOJ and the Department of Homeland Security claimed to have seized ten domains of websites involved in advertising and distributing child pornography, but also mistakenly seized the domain name of a large DNS provider, temporarily replacing 84,000 websites with seizure notices.<ref name="Wrongfully Seized 84000 Domains">{{cite web | url = http://torrentfreak.com/u-s-government-shuts-down-84000-websites-by-mistake-110216/ | title = U.S. Government Shuts Down 84,000 Websites, 'By Mistake' | access-date = 2012-12-16 | archive-date = 2018-12-25 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20181225071958/https://torrentfreak.com/u-s-government-shuts-down-84000-websites-by-mistake-110216/ | url-status = live }}</ref> In the [[United Kingdom]], the [[Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit]] (PIPCU) has been attempting to seize domain names from registrars without court orders.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Jeftovic|first1=Mark|title=Whatever Happened to "Due Process" ?|date=8 October 2013|url=http://blog.easydns.org/2013/10/08/whatever-happened-to-due-process/|access-date=27 November 2014|archive-date=5 December 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141205034320/http://blog.easydns.org/2013/10/08/whatever-happened-to-due-process/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)