Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Performance appraisal
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Objective production=== The objective production method consists of direct, but limited, measures such as sales figures, production numbers, the electronic performance monitoring of data entry workers, etc.{{sfn|Howes|Muchinsky|2022|p={{page needed|date=September 2024}}}} The measures used to appraise performance would depend on the job and its duties. Although these measures deal with unambiguous criteria, they are usually incomplete because of criterion contamination and criterion deficiency. Criterion contamination refers to the part of the actual criteria that is unrelated to the conceptual criteria.{{sfn|Howes|Muchinsky|2022|p={{page needed|date=September 2024}}}} In other words, the variability in performance can be due to factors outside of the employee's control. Criterion deficiency refers to the part of the conceptual criteria that is not measured by the actual criteria.{{sfn|Howes|Muchinsky|2022|p={{page needed|date=September 2024}}}} In other words, the quantity of production does not necessarily indicate the quality of the products. Both types of criterion inadequacies result in reduced [[Validity (logic)|validity]] of the measure.{{sfn|Howes|Muchinsky|2022|p={{page needed|date=September 2024}}}} Regardless of the fact that objective production data is not a complete reflection upon job performance, such data is relevant to job performance. ====Happy-productive worker hypothesis==== The happy-productive worker hypothesis states that the happiest workers are the most productive performers, and the most productive performers are the happiest workers.<ref name="Staw">{{cite journal |last1=Staw |first1=Barry M. |title=Organizational Psychology and the Pursuit of the Happy/Productive Worker |journal=California Management Review |date=July 1986 |volume=28 |issue=4 |pages=40–53 |doi=10.2307/41165214 |jstor=41165214 }}</ref> Yet, after decades of research, the relationship between [[job satisfaction]] and job performance produces only a weak positive correlation. Published in 2001 by ''Psychological Bulletin'', a meta-analysis of 312 research studies produced an uncorrected correlation of 0.18.<ref name="Judge">{{cite journal |last1=Judge |first1=Timothy A. |last2=Thoresen |first2=Carl J. |last3=Bono |first3=Joyce E. |last4=Patton |first4=Gregory K. |title=The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. |journal=Psychological Bulletin |date=2001 |volume=127 |issue=3 |pages=376–407 |doi=10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 |pmid=11393302 }}</ref> This correlation is much weaker than what the happy-productive worker hypothesis would predict.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)