Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Archaeogenetics
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Domestication of animals ==== Archaeogenetics has been used to study the domestication of animals.<ref name=":8">{{Cite web|url=https://anthropology.si.edu/archaeobio/images/zederetal_2006_docdom_tig.pdf|title=Documenting domestication: the inter- section of genetics and archaeology|last=Zeder |display-authors=etal }}</ref> By analyzing genetic diversity in domesticated animal populations researchers can search for genetic markers in DNA to give valuable insight about possible traits of progenitor species.<ref name=":8" /> These traits are then used to help distinguish archaeological remains between wild and domesticated specimens.<ref name=":8" /> The genetic studies can also lead to the identification of ancestors for domesticated animals.<ref name=":8" /> The information gained from genetics studies on current populations helps guide the Archaeologist's search for documenting these ancestors.<ref name=":8" /> Archaeogenetics has been used to trace the domestication of pigs throughout the old world.<ref name=":11">{{Cite journal|url=http://www.pnas.org/content/104/39/15276.full.pdf|title=Ancient DNA, pig domestication, and the spread of the Neolithic into Europe|last=Larson |display-authors=etal |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}}</ref> These studies also reveal evidence about the details of early farmers.<ref name=":11" /> Methods of Archaeogenetics have also been used to further understand the development of domestication of dogs.<ref name=":14">{{Cite journal|title=Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography|last=Larson |display-authors=etal |pmid=22615366|doi=10.1073/pnas.1203005109|volume=109|pmc=3384140|year=2012|journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.|issue=23|pages=8878β83|bibcode=2012PNAS..109.8878L|doi-access=free }}</ref> Genetic studies have shown that all dogs are descendants from the gray wolf, however, it is currently unknown when, where, and how many times dogs were domesticated.<ref name=":14" /> Some genetic studies have indicated multiple domestications while others have not.<ref name=":14" /> Archaeological findings help better understand this complicated past by providing solid evidence about the progression of the domestication of dogs.<ref name=":14" /> As early humans domesticated dogs the archaeological remains of buried dogs became increasingly more abundant.<ref name=":14" /> Not only does this provide more opportunities for archaeologists to study the remains, it also provides clues about early human culture.<ref name=":14" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)