Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Chatham House
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Reactions == Chatham House has been criticized for its perceived [[elitism]], lacking transparency in funding, and alignment with [[Interventionism (politics)|Western interventionism]]. Scholars have noted that the think tank is operated by political, academic, and corporate elites.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Medina-Iborra |first=Ivan |date=March 24, 2015 |title=Visibility and activity: foreign affairs think tanks in the United Kingdom |url=https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/16602/4-Medina-Guttormsen_AcceptedArticle_PoliticalPerspectivesSI_20121.pdf |website=University of Exeter}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Parmar |first=Inderjeet |date=2002-04-01 |title=Anglo-American Elites in the Interwar Years: Idealism and Power in the Intellectual Roots of Chatham House and the Council on Foreign Relations |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0047117802016001005 |journal=International Relations |language=EN |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=53–75 |doi=10.1177/0047117802016001005 |issn=0047-1178|url-access=subscription }}</ref> The ''[[Financial Times]]'' has questioned the organization's limited disclosure of funding sources, particularly in comparison to European counterparts.<ref>{{Cite web |title=British think-tanks ‘less transparent about sources of funding’ |url=https://www.ft.com/content/ae6968c4-b5ec-11e4-b58d-00144feab7de |access-date=2025-05-12 |website=www.ft.com |language=en-GB}}</ref> In one instance, the ''[[The Bureau of Investigative Journalism|Bureau of Investigative Journalism]]'' revealed that a report published by Chatham House was authored by a lobbyist with undisclosed financial interests in the subject matter, highlighting issues with Chatham House's editorial independence.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-05-12 |title=Chatham House’s independent expert is lobbyist {{!}} TBIJ |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250512135811/https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2011-12-08/chatham-houses-independent-expert-is-lobbyist |access-date=2025-05-12 |website=web.archive.org}}</ref> Critics have also argued that the institution has historically supported interventionist foreign policy positions, especially in relation to the [[Iraq War]] and [[Enlargement of NATO|NATO expansion]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Holmes |first=Flora |date=January 1, 2020 |title=Public Attitudes to UK Military Interventionism |url=https://bfpg.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Public-Attitudes-to-Military-Intervention-1.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Cox |first=Michael |date=March 1, 2021 |title=What do Think Tanks do? Chatham House in search of the United States |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350334875_What_do_Think_Tanks_do_Chatham_House_in_search_of_the_United_States |website=London School of Economics and Political Science}}</ref> The organization's confidentiality rule, famously known as the [[Chatham House Rule]], has been criticized for allowing influential participants to shape public discourse from behind closed doors while limiting public accountability and scrutiny.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sanburn |first=Josh |date=2016-06-09 |title=The World’s Most Powerful and Secret Group, Explained |url=https://time.com/4362872/bilderberg-group-meetings-2016-conspiracy-theories/ |access-date=2025-05-12 |website=TIME |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2025-01-11 |title=Why is every Bay Area event imposing Chatham House Rules? |url=https://sfstandard.com/2025/01/11/chatham-house-rule-burnout/ |access-date=2025-05-12 |website=The San Francisco Standard |language=en}}</ref> Some commentators argue that the rule obscures power dynamic, shields controversial statements, and hinders transparency.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-04-09 |title=The Chatham House Should Not Rule |url=https://kendraalbert.com/chatamhouse |access-date=2025-05-12 |website=Kendra Albert |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":0" /> Additionally, critics have highlighted the organization's early 20th-century role in reinforcing [[colonialism]], noting that its foundations were closely linked to [[British imperialism]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ba |first=Oumar |date=2024-04-03 |title=Now what? |url=https://www.duckofminerva.com/2024/04/now-what.html |access-date=2025-05-12 |website=The Duck of Minerva |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Williams |first=Paul |date=2003-03-01 |title=A Commonwealth of Knowledge: Empire, Intellectuals and the Chatham House Project, 1919–1939 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00471178030171003 |journal=International Relations |language=EN |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=35–58 |doi=10.1177/00471178030171003 |issn=0047-1178|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)