Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Error detection and correction
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Deep-space telecommunications === The development of error-correction codes was tightly coupled with the history of deep-space missions due to the extreme dilution of signal power over interplanetary distances, and the limited power availability aboard space probes. Whereas early missions sent their data uncoded, starting in 1968, digital error correction was implemented in the form of (sub-optimally decoded) [[convolutional code]]s and [[Reed–Muller code]]s.<ref name="deep-space-codes">K. Andrews et al., ''The Development of Turbo and LDPC Codes for Deep-Space Applications'', Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 95, No. 11, Nov. 2007.</ref> The Reed–Muller code was well suited to the noise the spacecraft was subject to (approximately matching a [[Gaussian function|bell curve]]), and was implemented for the Mariner spacecraft and used on missions between 1969 and 1977. The [[Voyager 1]] and [[Voyager 2]] missions, which started in 1977, were designed to deliver color imaging and scientific information from [[Jupiter]] and [[Saturn]].<ref name="voyager">{{cite book |first1=William Cary |last1=Huffman |first2=Vera S. |last2=Pless |author-link2=Vera Pless |title=Fundamentals of Error-Correcting Codes |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-521-78280-7 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsofer0000huff }}</ref> This resulted in increased coding requirements, and thus, the spacecraft were supported by (optimally [[Viterbi decoder|Viterbi-decoded]]) convolutional codes that could be [[concatenated code|concatenated]] with an outer [[Binary Golay code|Golay (24,12,8) code]]. The Voyager 2 craft additionally supported an implementation of a [[Reed–Solomon code]]. The concatenated Reed–Solomon–Viterbi (RSV) code allowed for very powerful error correction, and enabled the spacecraft's extended journey to [[Uranus]] and [[Neptune]]. After ECC system upgrades in 1989, both crafts used V2 RSV coding. The [[Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems]] currently recommends usage of error correction codes with performance similar to the Voyager 2 RSV code as a minimum. Concatenated codes are increasingly falling out of favor with space missions, and are replaced by more powerful codes such as [[Turbo code]]s or [[LDPC code]]s. The different kinds of deep space and orbital missions that are conducted suggest that trying to find a one-size-fits-all error correction system will be an ongoing problem. For missions close to Earth, the nature of the [[Noise (electronics)|noise]] in the [[communication channel]] is different from that which a spacecraft on an interplanetary mission experiences. Additionally, as a spacecraft increases its distance from Earth, the problem of correcting for noise becomes more difficult.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)