Editing Net neutrality (section)

==Legal aspects==
{{Main|Net neutrality law}}
Legal enforcement of net neutrality principles takes a variety of forms, from provisions that outlaw anti-competitive blocking and ''throttling'' of Internet services, all the way to legal enforcement that prevents companies from subsidizing Internet use on particular sites.<ref name="NYT-20150410">{{cite news |author=The Editorial Board |title=Editorial – Global Threats to Net Neutrality |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/10/opinion/global-threats-to-net-neutrality.html |date=10 April 2015 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=10 April 2015 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150411011236/http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/10/opinion/global-threats-to-net-neutrality.html |archive-date=11 April 2015}}</ref> Contrary to popular rhetoric and statements by various individuals involved in the ongoing academic debate, research suggests that a single policy instrument (such as a no-blocking policy or a quality of service tiering policy) cannot achieve the range of valued political and economic objectives central to the debate.<ref name="ReferenceC"/> As Bauer and Obar suggest, "safeguarding multiple goals requires a combination of instruments that will likely involve government and nongovernment measures. Furthermore, promoting [rights and] goals such as the [[freedom of speech]], political participation, investment, and innovation calls for complementary policies."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bauer |first1=Johannes |last2=Obar |first2=Jonathan A. |title=Reconciling political and economic goals in the net neutrality debate |journal=Information Policy |date=2014 |volume=30 |issue=1 |page=1 |ssrn=2910104 |doi=10.1080/01972243.2013.856362|s2cid=17970123 }}</ref>