Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Status quo bias
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Economic research === Status quo bias has a significant impact on economics research and policy creation. Anchoring and adjustment theory in economics is where people's decision-making and outcome are affected by their initial reference point. The reference point for a consumer is usually the status quo. Status quo bias results in the default option to be better understood by consumers compared to alternatives options. This results in the status quo option providing less uncertainty and higher expected utility for risk-averse decision makers.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Geng |first1=Sen |title=Decision Time, Consideration Time, and Status Quo Bias |journal=Economic Inquiry |date=January 2016 |volume=54 |issue=1 |pages=433–449 |doi=10.1111/ecin.12239|s2cid=153199766 }}</ref> Status quo bias is compounded by loss aversion theory where consumers see disadvantages as larger than advantages when making decision away from the reference point.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kahneman |first1=Daniel |title=Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics |journal=The American Economic Review |date=2003 |volume=93 |issue=5 |pages=1449–1475 |doi=10.1257/000282803322655392 |jstor=3132137 |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3132137 |access-date=20 April 2023 |issn=0002-8282|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Economics can also describe the effect of loss aversion graphically with a consumer’s utility function for losses having a negative and 2 times steeper curve than the utility function for gains.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kahneman |first1=Daniel |title=Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics |journal=The American Economic Review |date=2003 |volume=93 |issue=5 |pages=1449–1475 |doi=10.1257/000282803322655392 |jstor=3132137}}</ref> Therefore, they perceive the negative effect of a loss as more significant and will stay with status quo. Consumers choosing the status quo goes against rational [[consumer choice]] theory as they are not maximising their utility. Rational consumer choice theory underpins many economic decisions by defining a set of rules for [[consumer behaviour]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gerasímou |first1=Georgios |title=Consumer theory with bounded rational preferences |journal=Journal of Mathematical Economics |date=September 2010 |volume=46 |issue=5 |pages=708–714 |doi=10.1016/j.jmateco.2010.08.015|url=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18673/1/MPRA_paper_18673.pdf }}</ref> Therefore, status quo bias has substantial implications in economic theory.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)