Editing Women's rights (section)

===== 18th and 19th century Europe =====
{{Further|Women in the Victorian era}}
[[File:Johann Heinrich Füssli 049.jpg|upright=1.1|thumb|alt=Three women sitting around a small table, one sewing, one drinking a cup of what is possibly tea. All three are drawn to look almost horrific. The third woman looks as if she has two heads, but it may be that there are four women. The women's heads do not look like they are comfortable on their bodies. The colors are dark red, black, brown, and almond.|''The Debutante'' (1807) by [[Henry Fuseli]]; The woman, victim of male social conventions, is tied to the wall, made to sew and guarded by governesses. The picture reflects [[Mary Wollstonecraft]]'s views in ''[[A Vindication of the Rights of Woman]]'', published in 1792.<ref>Tomory, Peter. ''The Life and Art of Henry Fuseli.'' New York: Praeger Publishers, 1972; p. 217. {{LCCN|72077546}}.</ref>]]
Starting in the late 18th century, and throughout the 19th century, rights, as a concept and claim, gained increasing political, social, and philosophical importance in Europe. Movements emerged which demanded [[freedom of religion]], the abolition of [[slavery]], rights for women, rights for those who did not own property, and [[universal suffrage]].<ref>{{Cite book| last = Sweet| first = William| title = Philosophical theory and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights| publisher = University of Ottawa Press| year = 2003| page = 4| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=_V_KuJGcJSAC&q=%22natural+law%22+women+%22human+nature%22| isbn =978-0-7766-0558-6 }}</ref> In the late 18th century the question of women's rights became central to political debates in both France and Britain. At the time some of the greatest thinkers of the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]], who defended democratic principles of [[Egalitarianism|equality]] and challenged notions that a privileged few should rule over the vast majority of the population, believed that these principles should be applied only to their own gender and their own race. The philosopher [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]], for example, thought that it was the order of nature for women to obey men.<ref>{{cite book| last = Lauren| first = Paul Gordon| title = The evolution of international human rights: visions seen| publisher = University of Pennsylvania Press| year = 2003| pages = 29–30| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=gHRhWgbWyzMC&q=Declaration+of+the+Rights+of+Man+and+of+the+Citizen| isbn =978-0-8122-1854-1 }}</ref>

In 1754, [[Dorothea Erxleben]] became the first German woman receiving a [[Doctor of Medicine|M.D.]] ([[University of Halle]])<ref name="Offen, K. 2000 p. 43">Offen, K. (2000): ''European Feminisms, 1700-1950: A Political History'' (Stanford University Press), p. 43.</ref>
[[File:Mary Wollstonecraft by John Opie (c. 1797).jpg|thumb|right|[[Mary Wollstonecraft]] by [[John Opie]] (c. 1797)]]
[[File:Minna Canth.jpg|thumb|right|[[Minna Canth]] (1844–1897), a Finnish author and [[social activist]], was one of the most significant European feminists and advocates of women's rights.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://finland.fi/arts-culture/finnish-author-minna-canth-could-and-she-did/|title=Finnish author Minna Canth could, and she did|date=17 March 2017|website=thisisFINLAND}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://finland.fi/arts-culture/finlands-first-feminist-why-minna-canths-writing-is-still-important/|title=Finland's first feminist: Why Minna Canth's writing is still important|date=15 March 2019|website=thisisFINLAND}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://newsnowfinland.fi/arts-culture/day-of-equality-celebrates-minna-canths-legacy|title=Day of Equality celebrates Minna Canth's legacy &#124; News Now Finland|first=News Now|last=Staff|date=19 March 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://blogs.bl.uk/european/2017/05/a-feisty-finnish-feminist-minna-canth-.html|title=A feisty Finnish feminist: Minna Canth – European studies blog|website=blogs.bl.uk}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://allthingsnordic.eu/gender-equality-how-minna-canth-changed-finlands-route/ |title=Gender equality: how Minna Canth changed Finland's route |date=9 December 2019 |access-date=26 June 2020 |archive-date=29 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200629070037/https://allthingsnordic.eu/gender-equality-how-minna-canth-changed-finlands-route/ |url-status=live }}</ref>]]
[[File:DDFC.jpg|upright=1.1|thumb|left|First page of the [[Declaration of the Rights of Woman and of the Female Citizen]]]]
In 1791 the French playwright and political [[Activism|activist]] [[Olympe de Gouges]] published the [[Declaration of the Rights of Woman and of the Female Citizen]],<ref name=MS1112>Macdonald and Scherf, "Introduction", pp. 11–12.</ref> modelled on the [[Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen]] of 1789. The Declaration is ironic in formulation and exposes the failure of the [[French Revolution]], which had been devoted to equality. It states that: "This revolution will only take effect when all women become fully aware of their deplorable condition, and of the rights they have lost in society". The Declaration of the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen follows the seventeen articles of the [[Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen]] point for point and has been described by Camille Naish as "almost a parody... of the original document". The first article of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen proclaims that "Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be based only on common utility." The first article of the Declaration of the Rights of Woman and of the Female Citizen replied: "Woman is born free and remains equal to man in rights. Social distinctions may only be based on common utility". De Gouges expands the sixth article of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which declared the rights of citizens to take part in the formation of law, to:
[[File:Women suffrage cartoon.png|upright=1.1|thumb|Australian women's rights were lampooned in this 1887 ''Melbourne Punch'' cartoon: A hypothetical female member foists her baby's care on the House Speaker.]]
<blockquote>
All citizens including women are equally admissible to all public dignities, offices and employments, according to their capacity, and with no other distinction than that of their virtues and talents.
</blockquote>
De Gouges also draws attention to the fact that under French law women were fully punishable, yet denied equal rights.<ref>{{cite book |title=Death comes to the maiden: Sex and Execution, 1431–1933 |last=Naish |first=Camille |year=1991 |publisher=Routledge |isbn= 978-0-415-05585-7 |page=137 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=OHYOAAAAQAAJ&q=Declaration+of+the+Rights+of+Woman+and+the+Female+Citizen }}</ref>

[[Mary Wollstonecraft]], a British writer and philosopher, published ''[[A Vindication of the Rights of Woman]]'' in 1792, arguing that it was the education and upbringing of women that created limited expectations.<ref>Brody, Miriam. Mary Wollstonecraft: Sexuality and women's rights (1759–1797), in Spender, Dale (ed.) Feminist theorists: Three centuries of key women thinkers, Pantheon 1983, pp. 40–59 {{ISBN|0-394-53438-7}}.</ref><ref name=Walters>Walters, Margaret, ''Feminism: A very short introduction'' (Oxford, 2005), {{ISBN|978-0-19-280510-2}}.</ref> Wollstonecraft attacked gender oppression, pressing for equal educational opportunities, and demanded "justice!" and "rights to humanity" for all.<ref>{{cite book| last = Lauren| title = The evolution of international human rights: visions seen| publisher = University of Pennsylvania Press| year = 2003| page = 32| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=gHRhWgbWyzMC&q=Declaration+of+the+Rights+of+Man+and+of+the+Citizen| isbn = 978-0-8122-1854-1}}</ref> Wollstonecraft, along with her British contemporaries [[Damaris Cudworth]] and [[Catharine Macaulay]], started to use the language of rights in relation to women, arguing that women should have greater opportunity because like men, they were moral and rational beings.<ref>{{Cite book| last = Sweet| first = William| title = Philosophical theory and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights| publisher = University of Ottawa Press| year = 2003| page = 10| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=_V_KuJGcJSAC&q=%22natural+law%22+women+%22human+nature%22| isbn =978-0-7766-0558-6 }}</ref>
[[Mary Robinson (poet)|Mary Robinson]] wrote in a similar vein in "A Letter to the Women of England, on the Injustice of Mental Subordination.", 1799.

[[File:Mill's logic 1867.jpg|upright=1.15|left|thumb|A ''Punch'' cartoon from 1867 mocking [[John Stuart Mill]]'s attempt to replace the term 'man' with 'person', i.e. give women the right to vote. Caption: Mill's Logic: Or, Franchise for Females. "Pray clear the way, there, for these – a – persons."<ref name="Brave new world – Women's rights">{{cite web| title = Brave new world – Women's rights | publisher = National Archives| url = http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/citizenship/brave_new_world/women.htm| access-date =15 January 2011 }}</ref>]]
In his 1869 essay "[[The Subjection of Women]]" the English philosopher and political theorist [[John Stuart Mill]] described the situation for women in Britain as follows:
<blockquote>
We are continually told that civilization and Christianity have restored to the woman her just rights. Meanwhile, the wife is the actual bondservant of her husband; no less so, as far as the legal obligation goes, than slaves commonly so called.</blockquote>

Then a member of parliament, Mill argued that women deserve the [[right to vote]], though his proposal to replace the term "man" with "person" in the second [[Reform Bill of&nbsp;1867]] was greeted with laughter in the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] and defeated by 76&nbsp;to&nbsp;196 votes. His arguments won little support amongst contemporaries<ref name="Brave new world – Women's rights"/> but his attempt to amend the reform bill generated greater attention for the issue of women's suffrage in Britain.<ref name=suffrage/> Initially only one of several women's rights campaigns, suffrage became the primary cause of the British women's movement at the beginning of the 20th century.<ref>{{cite book |title=The women's suffrage movement in Britain, 1866–1928 |last=Van Wingerden |first=Sophia A. |year=1999 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn= 978-0-312-21853-9 |pages=1–2 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=0oLxK_NHI6kC }}</ref> At the time, the ability to vote was restricted to wealthy [[Property law|property owners]] within British jurisdictions. This arrangement implicitly excluded women as [[property law]] and [[marriage law]] gave men ownership rights at marriage or inheritance until the 19th century. Although male suffrage broadened during the century, women were explicitly prohibited from voting nationally and locally in the 1830s by the [[Reform Act 1832]] and the [[Municipal Corporations Act 1835]].<ref name=X>Phillips, Melanie, ''The Ascent of Woman: A History of the Suffragette Movement'' (Abacus, 2004)</ref> [[Millicent Fawcett]] and [[Emmeline Pankhurst]] led the public campaign on women's suffrage and in 1918 a bill was passed allowing women over the age of 30 to vote.<ref name="X" />

By the 1860s, the economic sexual politics of middle-class women in Britain and its neighboring Western European countries was guided by factors such as the evolution of 19th century [[Consumerism|consumer]] culture. While women, particularly those in the middle class, obtained modest control of daily household expenses and had the ability to leave the house, attend social events, and shop for personal and household items, Europe's socioeconomic climate pervaded the ideology that women were not in complete control over their urges to spend (assuming) their husband or father's wages. As a result, many advertisements for socially 'feminine' goods revolved around upward social progression, [[exoticism]]s from the [[Orient]], and added efficiency for household roles women were deemed responsible for.<ref name="Lysack, Krista 2008">Lysack, Krista. Come buy, come buy: shopping and the culture of consumption in Victorian women's writing. n.p.: Athens : Ohio University Press, c2008., 2008.</ref><ref>Rappaport, Erika Diane. Shopping for pleasure: women in the making of London's West End. n.p.: Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, c2000., 2000.</ref>