Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Bohr effect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Controversy === There is some more debate over whether Bohr was actually the first to discover the relationship between CO<sub>2</sub> and oxygen affinity, or whether the Russian physiologist {{ill|Bronislav Verigo|ru|Вериго, Бронислав Фортунатович}} beat him to it, allegedly discovering the effect in 1898, six years before Bohr.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/medic2/8579|title=Вериго эффект - это... Что такое Вериго эффект?|newspaper=Словари и энциклопедии на Академике|language=ru|trans-title=Verigo effect is... What is the Verigo effect?|access-date=2016-11-08}}</ref> While this has never been proven, Verigo did in fact publish a paper on the haemoglobin-CO<sub>2</sub> relationship in 1892.<ref>B. Werigo, "Zur Frage uber die Wirkung des Sauerstoffs auf die Kohlensaureausscheidung in den Lungen," [The question about the effect of oxygen on the secretion of carbonic acid in the lungs]. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. (in German), 51 (1892), 321-361. </ref> His proposed model was flawed, and Bohr harshly criticized it in his own publications.<ref name=":2" /> Another challenge to Bohr's discovery comes from within his lab. Though Bohr was quick to take full credit, his associate Krogh, who invented the apparatus used to measure gas concentrations in the experiments,<ref>A. Krogh, "Apparat und Methoden zur Bestimmung der Aufnahme von Gasen im Blute bei verschiedenen Spannungen der Gase," [Apparatus and methods for the determination of the absorption of gases in the blood at different tensions of the gases]. Skand. Arch. Physiol. (in German), 16 (1904), 390-401.</ref> maintained throughout his life that he himself had actually been the first to demonstrate the effect. Though there is some evidence to support this, retroactively changing the name of a well-known phenomenon would be extremely impractical, so it remains known as the Bohr effect.<ref name=":3" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)