Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Box topology
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Properties== Box topology on '''R'''<sup>''Ο''</sup>:<ref>Steen, Seebach, 109. pp. 128–129.</ref> * The box topology is [[completely regular]] * The box topology is neither [[compact space|compact]] nor [[Connected space|connected]] * The box topology is not [[first countable]] (hence not [[metrizable]]) * The box topology is not [[separable space|separable]] * The box topology is [[paracompact]] (and hence normal and completely regular) if the [[continuum hypothesis]] is true === Example β failure of continuity === The following example is based on the [[Hilbert cube]]. Let '''R'''<sup>''Ο''</sup> denote the countable cartesian product of '''R''' with itself, i.e. the set of all [[sequence]]s in '''R'''. Equip '''R''' with the [[Real line#As a topological space|standard topology]] and '''R'''<sup>''Ο''</sup> with the box topology. Define: :<math>\begin{cases} f : \mathbf{R} \to \mathbf{R}^\omega \\ x \mapsto (x,x,x, \ldots) \end{cases}</math> So all the component functions are the identity and hence continuous, however we will show ''f'' is not continuous. To see this, consider the open set :<math> U = \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \left ( -\tfrac{1}{n}, \tfrac{1}{n} \right ).</math> Suppose ''f'' were continuous. Then, since: :<math>f(0) = (0,0,0, \ldots ) \in U,</math> there should exist <math>\varepsilon > 0</math> such that <math>(-\varepsilon, \varepsilon) \subset f^{-1}(U).</math> But this would imply that :<math> f\left (\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} \right ) = \left ( \tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}, \tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}, \tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}, \ldots \right ) \in U,</math> which is false since <math>\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} > \tfrac{1}{n}</math> for <math>n > \tfrac{2}{\varepsilon}.</math> Thus ''f'' is not continuous even though all its component functions are. === Example β failure of compactness === Consider the countable product <math>X = \prod_{i \in \N} X_i</math> where for each ''i'', <math>X_i = \{0,1\}</math> with the discrete topology. The box topology on <math>X</math> will also be the discrete topology. Since discrete spaces are compact if and only if they are finite, we immediately see that <math>X</math> is not compact, even though its component spaces are. <math>X</math> is not sequentially compact either: consider the sequence <math>\{x_n\}_{n=1}^\infty</math> given by :<math>(x_n)_m=\begin{cases} 0 & m < n \\ 1 & m \ge n \end{cases}</math> Since no two points in the sequence are the same, the sequence has no limit point, and therefore <math>X</math> is not sequentially compact. ===Convergence in the box topology=== Topologies are often best understood by describing how sequences converge. In general, a Cartesian product of a space <math>X</math> with itself over an [[index set|indexing set]] <math>S</math> is precisely the space of functions from <math>S</math> to <math>X</math>'','' denoted <math display="inline">\prod_{s \in S} X = X^S</math>. The product topology yields the topology of [[pointwise convergence]]; sequences of functions converge if and only if they converge at every point of <math>S</math>. Because the box topology is finer than the product topology, convergence of a sequence in the box topology is a more stringent condition. Assuming <math>X</math> is Hausdorff, a sequence <math>(f_n)_n</math> of functions in <math>X^S</math> converges in the box topology to a function <math>f\in X^S</math> if and only if it converges pointwise to <math>f</math> and there is a finite subset <math>S_0\subset S</math> and there is an <math>N</math> such that for all <math>n>N</math> the sequence <math>(f_n(s))_n</math> in <math>X</math> is constant for all <math>s\in S\setminus S_0</math>. In other words, the sequence <math>(f_n(s))_n</math> is eventually constant for nearly all <math>s</math> and in a uniform way.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Scott|first1=Brian M.|title=Difference between the behavior of a sequence and a function in product and box topology on same set|url=https://math.stackexchange.com/q/448575|website=math.stackexchange.com}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)