Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Bracero Program
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Program Expansion and Continuation == The agreement was extended with the Migrant Labor Agreement of 1951 ({{uspl|82|78}}), enacted as an amendment to the [[Agricultural Act of 1949]] by the [[United States Congress]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=1951-07-12 |title=Text - S.984 - 82nd Congress (1951-1952): An Act to amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 |url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/82nd-congress/senate-bill/984/text |access-date=2025-04-14 |website=www.congress.gov}}</ref> which set the official parameters for the Bracero Program until its termination in 1964.<ref name="Calavita-1992">{{Cite book |title = Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the I. N. S. |last = Calavita |first = Kitty |publisher = Quid Pro, LLC |year = 1992 |isbn = 0-9827504-8-X |location = New York |page = 1 }}</ref> In studies published in 2018 and 2023, it was found that the Bracero Program did not have an adverse effect on the wages or employment for American-born farm workers,<ref name="Clemens-2018">{{Cite journal |last1=Clemens |first1=Michael A. |last2=Lewis |first2=Ethan G. |last3=Postel |first3=Hannah M. |date=June 2018 |title=Immigration Restrictions as Active Labor Market Policy: Evidence from the Mexican Bracero Exclusion |journal=American Economic Review |language=en |volume=108 |issue=6 |pages=1468β1487 |doi=10.1257/aer.20170765 |issn=0002-8282 |pmc=6040835 |pmid=30008480 |quote=We find that bracero exclusion failed to raise wages or substantially raise employment for domestic workers in the sector.}}</ref> and that termination of the program had adverse impact on American-born farmers and resulted in increased farm mechanization.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last=San |first=Shmuel |date=2023 |title=Labor Supply and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Termination of the Bracero Program in 1964 |url=https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/app.20200664 |journal=American Economic Journal: Applied Economics |language=en |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=136β163 |doi=10.1257/app.20200664 |issn=1945-7782|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Since abolition of the Bracero Program, temporary agricultural workers have been admitted with H-2 and [[H-2A visa]]s.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)