Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
CW complex
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== CW complex === A '''CW complex''' is constructed by taking the union of a sequence of topological spaces <math display="block">\emptyset = X_{-1} \subset X_0 \subset X_1 \subset \cdots</math> such that each <math>X_k</math> is obtained from <math>X_{k-1}</math> by gluing copies of k-cells <math>(e^k_\alpha)_\alpha</math>, each homeomorphic to the open <math>k</math>-[[ball (mathematics)|ball]] <math>B^k</math>, to <math>X_{k-1}</math> by continuous gluing maps <math>g^k_\alpha: \partial e^k_\alpha \to X_{k-1}</math>. The maps are also called [[attaching map]]s. Thus as a set, <math>X_k = X_{k-1} \sqcup_{\alpha} e^k_\alpha</math>. Each <math>X_k</math> is called the '''k-skeleton''' of the complex. The topology of <math>X = \cup_{k} X_k</math> is '''weak topology''': a subset <math>U\subset X</math> is open [[iff]] <math>U\cap X_k</math> is open for each k-skeleton <math>X_k</math>. In the language of category theory, the topology on <math>X</math> is the [[direct limit]] of the diagram <math display="block">X_{-1} \hookrightarrow X_0 \hookrightarrow X_1 \hookrightarrow \cdots</math>The name "CW" stands for "closure-finite weak topology", which is explained by the following theorem: {{Math theorem | name = Theorem | note = | math_statement = A [[Hausdorff space]] ''X'' is homeomorphic to a CW complex iff there exists a [[partition of a set|partition]] of ''X'' into "open cells" <math>e^k_\alpha</math>, each with a corresponding closure (or "closed cell") <math>\bar{e}^k_\alpha := cl_X(e^k_\alpha)</math> that satisfies: * For each <math>e^k_\alpha</math>, there exists a [[Continuous function#Continuous functions between topological spaces|continuous surjection]] <math>g_\alpha^k: D^k \to \bar{e}^k_\alpha</math> from the <math>k</math>-dimensional closed ball such that ** The restriction to the open ball <math>g_\alpha^k: B^k\to e^k_\alpha </math> is a [[homeomorphism]]. ** (closure-finiteness) The image of the boundary <math>g^k_\alpha(\partial D^k) </math> is covered by a finite number of closed cells, each having cell dimension less than k. * (weak topology) A subset of ''X'' is [[Closed set|closed]] if and only if it meets each closed cell in a closed set. }} This partition of ''X'' is also called a '''cellulation'''. ==== The construction, in words ==== The CW complex construction is a straightforward generalization of the following process: * A 0-''dimensional CW complex'' is just a set of zero or more discrete points (with the [[Discrete space|discrete topology]]). * A 1-''dimensional CW complex'' is constructed by taking the [[Disjoint union (topology)|disjoint union]] of a 0-dimensional CW complex with one or more copies of the [[unit interval]]. For each copy, there is a map that "[[Gluing (topology)|glues]]" its boundary (its two endpoints) to elements of the 0-dimensional complex (the points). The topology of the CW complex is the topology of the [[Quotient space (topology)|quotient space]] defined by these gluing maps. * In general, an ''n-dimensional CW complex'' is constructed by taking the disjoint union of a ''k''-dimensional CW complex (for some <math>k<n</math>) with one or more copies of the [[Ball (mathematics)|''n''-dimensional ball]]. For each copy, there is a map that "glues" its boundary (the <math>(n-1)</math>-dimensional [[N-sphere|sphere]]) to elements of the <math>k</math>-dimensional complex. The topology of the CW complex is the [[quotient topology]] defined by these gluing maps. * An ''infinite-dimensional CW complex'' can be constructed by repeating the above process countably many times. Since the topology of the union <math>\cup_k X_k</math> is indeterminate, one takes the direct limit topology, since the diagram is highly suggestive of a direct limit. This turns out to have great technical benefits.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)