Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Classifying space
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Formalism== A more formal statement takes into account that ''G'' may be a [[topological group]] (not simply a ''discrete group''), and that [[Group action (mathematics)|group action]]s of ''G'' are taken to be continuous; in the absence of continuous actions the classifying space concept can be dealt with, in homotopy terms, via the [[Eilenberg–MacLane space]] construction. In homotopy theory the definition of a topological space ''BG'', the '''classifying space''' for principal ''G''-bundles, is given, together with the space ''EG'' which is the '''total space''' of the [[universal bundle]] over ''BG''. That is, what is provided is in fact a [[continuous mapping]] :<math>\pi\colon EG\longrightarrow BG. </math> Assume that the homotopy category of [[CW complex]]es is the underlying category, from now on. The ''classifying'' property required of ''BG'' in fact relates to π. We must be able to say that given any principal ''G''-bundle :<math>\gamma\colon Y\longrightarrow Z\ </math> over a space ''Z'', there is a '''classifying map''' φ from ''Z'' to ''BG'', such that <math>\gamma</math> is the [[pullback of a bundle|pullback]] of π along φ. In less abstract terms, the construction of <math>\gamma</math> by 'twisting' should be reducible via φ to the twisting already expressed by the construction of π. For this to be a useful concept, there evidently must be some reason to believe such spaces ''BG'' exist. The early work on classifying spaces introduced constructions (for example, the [[bar construction]]), that gave concrete descriptions of ''BG'' as a [[simplicial complex]] for an arbitrary discrete group. Such constructions make evident the connection with [[group cohomology]]. Specifically, let ''EG'' be the [[Delta set|weak simplicial complex]] whose ''n-'' simplices are the ordered (''n''+1)-tuples <math>[g_0,\ldots,g_n]</math> of elements of ''G''. Such an ''n-''simplex attaches to the (n−1) simplices <math>[g_0,\ldots,\hat g_i,\ldots,g_n]</math> in the same way a standard simplex attaches to its faces, where <math>\hat g_i</math> means this vertex is deleted. The complex EG is contractible. The group ''G'' acts on ''EG'' by left multiplication, :<math>g\cdot[g_0,\ldots,g_n ]=[gg_0,\ldots,gg_n],</math> and only the identity ''e'' takes any simplex to itself. Thus the action of ''G'' on ''EG'' is a covering space action and the quotient map <math>EG\to EG/G</math> is the universal cover of the orbit space <math>BG = EG/G</math>, and ''BG'' is a <math>K(G,1)</math>.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Hatcher |first=Allen |author-link=Allen Hatcher|title=Algebraic topology|date=2002|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|isbn=0-521-79160-X |pages=89|oclc=45420394}}</ref> In abstract terms (which are not those originally used around 1950 when the idea was first introduced) this is a question of whether a certain functor is [[representable functor|representable]]: the [[contravariant functor]] from the homotopy category to the [[category of sets]], defined by :''h''(''Z'') = set of isomorphism classes of principal ''G''-bundles on ''Z.'' The abstract conditions being known for this ([[Brown's representability theorem]]) ensure that the result, as an [[existence theorem]], is affirmative and not too difficult.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)