Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Comics Code Authority
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Criticism and enforcement === Some publishers thrived under these restrictions, while others adapted by cancelling titles and focusing on code-approved content; still others went out of business. In practice, the negative effect of not having CCA approval was lack of distribution by the comic book wholesalers, who, as one historian observed, "served as the enforcement arm of the Comics Code Authority by agreeing to handle only those comics with the seal."<ref>{{cite web | url = http://cbldf.org/comics-code-history-the-seal-of-approval/ | title = Comics Code History: The Seal of Approval | first = Dr. Amy Kiste | last = Nyberg | publisher = [[Comic Book Legal Defense Fund]] | date = n.d. | access-date = January 17, 2013 | archive-date = October 1, 2011 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111001032230/http://cbldf.org/comics-code-history-the-seal-of-approval/ | url-status = dead }}</ref> Publisher [[William Gaines]] believed that clauses forbidding the words "crime", "horror", and "terror" in comic book titles had been deliberately aimed at his own best-selling titles ''[[Crime SuspenStories]]'', ''[[The Vault of Horror (comics)|The Vault of Horror]]'', and ''[[Tales from the Crypt (comics)|Tales from the Crypt]]''.<ref>Jacobs, F: "The Mad World of William M. Gaines", pages 112β114, Lyle Stuart, Inc, 1972</ref><ref>"An Interview With William M. Gaines", Comics Journal #83 pages 76β78, Fantagraphics, Inc, 1983</ref> Wertham dismissed the code as an inadequate half-measure.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[The New York Times]]|date= February 5, 1955|title=Whip, Knife, Shown as 'Comics' Lures|first= Emma |last=Harrison|page= 17}}</ref> Comics analyst [[Scott McCloud]], on the other hand, later commented that it was as if, in drawing up the code, "the list of requirements a film needs to receive a G rating was doubled, and there were no other acceptable ratings!"<ref>{{cite book |last1=McCloud |first1=Scott |author-link1=Scott McCloud | title=Reinventing Comics: How Imagination and Technology Are Revolutionizing an Art Form |year=2000 |publisher=Perennial |location=New York |isbn=0-06-095350-0 |oclc=44654496}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)