Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Comparative literature
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Early work== Work considered foundational to the discipline of comparative literature include Spanish humanist [[Juan Andrés]]'s work, Transylvanian Hungarian [[Hugó Meltzl|Hugo Meltzl]] de Lomnitz's scholarship, also the founding editor of the journal ''Acta Comparationis Litterarum Universarum'' (1877) and Irish scholar [[H.M. Posnett]]'s ''Comparative Literature'' (1886). However, antecedents can be found in the ideas of [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]] in his vision of "[[world literature]]" (''Weltliteratur)'' and [[Russian Formalists]] credited [[Alexander Veselovsky]] with laying the groundwork for the discipline. [[Viktor Zhirmunsky]], for instance, referred to Veselovsky as "the most remarkable representative of comparative literary study in Russian and European scholarship of the nineteenth century" (Zhirmunsky qtd. in Rachel Polonsky, ''English Literature and the Russian Aesthetic Renaissance'' [Cambridge UP, 1998. 17]; see also David Damrosch<ref>{{citation |last=Damrosch | first=David |author-link=David Damrosch |year=2006 |url=http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/comparative_critical_studies/v003/3.1damrosch.html |title=Rebirth of a Discipline: The Global Origins of Comparative Studies |journal=Comparative Critical Studies |volume=3 |issue=1 | pages=99–112 |publisher=British Comparative Literature | doi=10.3366/ccs.2006.3.1-2.99 |access-date=Dec 18, 2011 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> During the late 19th century, comparatists such as [[Fyodor Buslaev]] were chiefly concerned with deducing the purported [[Zeitgeist]] or "spirit of the times", which they assumed to be embodied in the literary output of each nation. Although many comparative works from this period would be judged chauvinistic, [[Eurocentric]], or even racist by present-day standards, the intention of most scholars during this period was to increase the understanding of other cultures, not to assert superiority over them (although politicians and others from outside the field sometimes used their works for this purpose).{{Citation needed|date=November 2009}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)