Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Contra-rotating propellers
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Advantages and disadvantages== The torque on the aircraft from a pair of contra-rotating propellers effectively cancels out. Contra-rotating propellers have been found to be between 6% and 16% more efficient than normal propellers.<ref name=vrover>{{cite report |title=Analysis of a contra-rotating propeller driven transport aircraft |given1=J. S. |surname1=Vanderover |given2=K. D. |surname2=Visser |url=https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showatt.php?attachmentid=2815700}}</ref> However they can be very noisy, with increases in noise in the axial (forward and aft) direction of up to 30 dB, and tangentially 10 dB.<ref name=vrover/> Most of this extra noise can be found in the higher frequencies. These substantial noise problems limit commercial applications. One possibility is to enclose the contra-rotating propellers [[Ducted fan|in a shroud]].<ref>{{cite conference |url=http://supersonic.eng.uci.edu/download/AIAA-2013-0217.pdf |title=Aeroacoustic testing of open rotors at very small scale |access-date=August 5, 2016 |last1=Truong |first1=Alexander |first2=Dimitri |last2=Papamoschou |edition=51st |conference=AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting |date=January 7, 2013 |location=Grapevine, Texas, USA |conference-url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/book/10.2514/MASM13}}</ref> It is also helpful if the tip speed or the loading of the blades is reduced, if the aft propeller has fewer blades or a smaller diameter than the fore propeller, or if the spacing between the aft and fore propellers is increased.<ref>{{cite book |surname1=Hager |given1=Roy V |surname2=Vrabel |given2=Deborah |title=Advanced turboprop project |date=1988 |publisher=National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Scientific and Technical Information Division |location=Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio |pages=[https://archive.org/details/NASA_NTRS_Archive_19890003194/page/n93 82], 98β100 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170313115348/http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890003194.pdf |url-status=live |archive-date=March 13, 2017 |url=https://archive.org/details/NASA_NTRS_Archive_19890003194 |access-date=February 2, 2019 |language=en |series=NASA SP-495 |oclc=17508419}} [https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19890003194 alternate url]</ref> The efficiency of a contra-rotating propeller is somewhat offset by its mechanical complexity and the added weight of this gearing that makes the aircraft heavier, thus some performance is sacrificed to carry it. Nonetheless, coaxial contra-rotating propellers and [[Coaxial rotors|rotors]] have been used in several [[military aircraft]], such as the [[Tupolev Tu-95|Tupolev Tu-95 "Bear"]]. They are also being examined for use in [[airliner]]s.<ref>Kijk magazine, 1/2013</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)