Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Correspondence principle
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Bohr's correspondence principle === The seeds of Bohr's correspondence principle appeared from two sources. First Sommerfeld and [[Max Born]] developed a "quantization procedure" based on the [[Action-angle coordinates|action angle]] variables of classical Hamiltonian mechanics. This gave a mathematical foundation for stationary states of the [[Bohr-Sommerfeld model]] of the atom. The second seed was [[Albert Einstein]]'s quantum derivation of Planck's law in 1916. Einstein developed the statistical mechanics for Bohr-model atoms interacting with electromagnetic radiation, leading to absorption and two kinds of emission, [[Spontaneous emission|spontaneous]] and [[stimulated emission]]. But for Bohr the important result was the use of classical analogies and the Bohr atomic model to fix inconsistencies in Planck's derivation of the blackbody radiation formula.<ref name=Darrigol_C2Q>{{Cite book |last=Darrigol |first=Olivier |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1525/9780520328280/html |title=From c-Numbers to q-Numbers: The Classical Analogy in the History of Quantum Theory |date=1992-12-31 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-32828-0 |doi=10.1525/9780520328280}}</ref>{{rp|118}} Bohr used the word "''correspondence''" in italics in lectures and writing before calling it a correspondence principle. He viewed this as a correspondence between quantum motion and radiation, not between classical and quantum theories. He writes in 1920 that there exists "a far-reaching correspondence between the various types of possible transitions between the stationary states on the one hand and the various harmonic components of the motion on the other hand."<ref name=Darrigol_C2Q/>{{rp|138}} Bohr's first article containing the definition of the correspondence principle<ref name=Messiah_vI>{{Cite book |last=Messiah |first=Albert |title=Quantum mechanics. 1 |date=1976 |publisher=North-Holland |isbn=978-0-471-59766-7 |edition=22. print |location=Amsterdam}}</ref>{{rp|29}} was in 1923, in a summary paper entitled (in the English translation) "On the application of quantum theory to atomic structure". In his chapter II, "The process of radiation", he defines his correspondence principle as a condition connecting harmonic components of the electron moment to the possible occurrence of a radiative transition.<ref name=BohrCorrespondence>Bohr, Niels. On the Application of the Quantum Theory to Atomic Structure: Part I. The Fundamental Postulates. United Kingdom, The University Press, 1924.</ref>{{rp|22}} In modern terms, this condition is a [[selection rule]], saying that a given quantum jump is possible if and only if a particular type of motion exists in the corresponding classical model.<ref name="SEP"/> Following his definition of the correspondence principle, Bohr describes two applications. First he shows that the frequency of emitted radiation is related to an integral which can be well approximated by a sum when the quantum numbers inside the integral are large compared with their differences.<ref name=BohrCorrespondence/>{{rp|23}} Similarly he shows a relationship for the intensities of spectral lines and thus the rates at which quantum jumps occur. These asymptotic relationships are expressed by Bohr as consequences of his general correspondence principle. However, historically each of these applications have been called "the correspondence principle".<ref name="SEP"/> The PhD dissertation of [[Hans Kramers]] working in Bohr's group in Copenhagen applied Bohr's correspondence principle to account for all of the known facts of the spectroscopic [[Stark effect]], including some spectral components not known at the time of Kramers work.<ref name=KraghOnBohr2012>{{Cite book |last=Kragh |first=Helge |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/5807 |title=Niels Bohr and the Quantum Atom: The Bohr Model of Atomic Structure 1913–1925 |date=2012-05-17 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-965498-7 |language=en |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654987.003.0005}}</ref>{{rp|189}} Sommerfeld had been skeptical of the correspondence principle as it did not seem to be a consequence of a fundamental theory; Kramers' work convinced him that the principle had heuristic utility nevertheless. Other physicists picked up the concept, including work by [[John Van Vleck]] and by Kramers and Heisenberg on [[dispersion relation|dispersion]] theory.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Duncan |first=Anthony |last2=Janssen |first2=Michel |date=2007-10-09 |title=On the verge of Umdeutung in Minnesota: Van Vleck and the correspondence principle. Part one |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00407-007-0010-x |journal=Archive for History of Exact Sciences |language=en |volume=61 |issue=6 |pages=553–624 |doi=10.1007/s00407-007-0010-x |issn=0003-9519|arxiv=physics/0610192 }}</ref> The principle became a cornerstone of the semi-classical Bohr-Sommerfeld atomic theory; Bohr's 1922 Nobel prize was partly awarded for his work with the correspondence principle.<ref name=KraghOnBohr2012/>{{rp|5.4}} Despite the successes, the physical theories based on the principle faced increasing challenges in the early 1920s. Theoretical calculations by Van Vleck and by Kramers of the [[ionization potential]] of [[Helium]] disagreed significantly with experimental values.<ref name=Darrigol_C2Q/>{{rp|175}} Bohr, Kramers, and [[John C. Slater]] responded with a new theoretical approach now called the [[BKS theory]] based on the correspondence principle but disavowing [[conservation of energy]]. Einstein and [[Wolfgang Pauli]] criticized the new approach, and the [[Bothe–Geiger coincidence experiment]] showed that energy was conserved in quantum collisions.<ref name=Darrigol_C2Q/>{{rp|252}} With the existing theories in conflict with observations, two new quantum mechanics concepts arose. First, Heisenberg's 1925 [[Umdeutung paper|''Umdeutung'' paper]] on [[matrix mechanics]] was inspired by the correspondence principle, although he did not cite Bohr.<ref name="SEP" /> Further development in collaboration with [[Pascual Jordan]] and [[Max Born]] resulted in a mathematical model without connection to the principle. Second, [[Schrodinger equation|Schrodinger's wave mechanics]] in the following year similarly did not use the principle. Both pictures were later shown to be equivalent and accurate enough to replace old quantum theory. These approaches have no atomic orbits: the correspondence is more of an analogy than a principle.<ref name=Darrigol_C2Q/>{{rp|284}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)