Editing Cosmic variance (section)

== Philosophical issues ==
This raises [[philosophy|philosophical]] problems: suppose that random physical processes happen on length scales both smaller than and bigger than the [[particle horizon]]. A physical process (such as an amplitude of a primordial [[wiktionary:perturbation|perturbation]] in density) that happens on the horizon scale only gives us one observable realization. A physical process on a larger scale gives us zero observable realizations. A physical process on a slightly smaller scale gives us a small number of realizations.

In the case of only one realization it is difficult to draw statistical conclusions about its significance. For example, if the underlying model of a physical process implies that the observed property should occur only 1% of the time, does that really mean that the model is excluded? Consider the physical model of the citizenship of human beings in the early 21st century, where about 30% are [[India]]n and [[China|Chinese]] citizens, about 5% are [[United States|American]] citizens, about 1% are [[France|French]] citizens, and so on. For an observer who has only one observation (of his/her own citizenship) and who happens to be French and cannot make any external observations, the model can be rejected at the 99% significance level. Yet the external observers with more information unavailable to the first observer, know that the model is correct.

In other words, even if the bit of the universe observed is the result of a statistical process, the observer can only view one realization of that process, so our observation is statistically insignificant for saying much about the model, unless the observer is careful to include the [[variance]]. This variance is called the ''cosmic variance'' and is separate from other sources of experimental error: a very accurate measurement of only one value drawn from a [[probability distribution|distribution]] still leaves considerable uncertainty about the underlying model. Variance is normally plotted separately from other sources of uncertainty. Because it is necessarily a large fraction of the signal, workers must be very careful in interpreting the statistical significance of measurements on scales close to the [[particle horizon]].

In [[physical cosmology]], the common way of dealing with this on the horizon scale and on slightly sub-horizon scales (where the number of occurrences is greater than one but still quite small), is to explicitly include the [[variance]] of very small statistical samples ([[Poisson distribution]]) when calculating [[uncertainty|uncertainties]].<ref name="oxford">{{Cite journal|title=Analysis of the Kamionkowski-Loeb method of reducing cosmic variance with CMB polarization|journal=Physical Review D|volume=70|issue=6|pages=063504|year=2004|author=Portsmouth, Jamie|bibcode=2004PhRvD..70f3504P|arxiv = astro-ph/0402173 |doi = 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.063504 |s2cid=119349882}}</ref> This is important in describing the low [[spherical harmonic|multipoles]] of the [[cosmic microwave background]] and has been the source of much controversy in the cosmology community since the [[Cosmic Background Explorer|COBE]] and [[WMAP]] measurements.