Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Curry's paradox
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Informal proof=== The standard method for proving [[conditional sentence]]s (sentences of the form "if ''A'', then ''B''") is called "[[conditional proof]]". In this method, in order to prove "if ''A'', then ''B''", first ''A'' is assumed and then with that assumption ''B'' is shown to be true. To produce Curry's paradox, as described in the two steps above, apply this method to the sentence "if this sentence is true, then Germany borders China". Here ''A'', "this sentence is true", refers to the overall sentence, while ''B'' is "Germany borders China". So, assuming ''A'' is the same as assuming "If ''A'', then ''B''". Therefore, in assuming ''A'', we have assumed both ''A'' and "If ''A'', then ''B''". Therefore, ''B'' is true, by [[modus ponens]], and we have proven "If this sentence is true, then 'Germany borders China' is true." in the usual way, by assuming the hypothesis and deriving the conclusion. Now, because we have proved "If this sentence is true, then 'Germany borders China' is true", then we can again apply modus ponens, because we know that the claim "this sentence is true" is correct. In this way, we can deduce that Germany borders China.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)