Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Descriptive complexity theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Overview of characterisations of complexity classes== If we restrict ourselves to ordered structures with a successor relation and basic arithmetical predicates, then we get the following characterisations: * [[First-order logic]] defines the class [[AC0|AC<sup>0</sup>]], the languages recognized by polynomial-size circuits of bounded depth, which equals the languages recognized by a [[concurrent random access machine]] in constant time.<ref name="Immerman 1999, p. 86">Immerman 1999, p. 86</ref> * First-order logic augmented with symmetric or deterministic [[transitive closure]] operators yield [[L (complexity)|L]], problems solvable in logarithmic space.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Grädel|first1=Erich|last2=Schalthöfer|first2=Svenja|date=2019|title=Choiceless Logarithmic Space|series=Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)|volume=138|url=http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2019/10975/|language=en|pages=31:1–31:15|doi=10.4230/LIPICS.MFCS.2019.31|doi-access=free |isbn=9783959771177}}</ref> * First-order logic with a [[transitive closure]] operator yields [[NL (complexity)|NL]], the problems solvable in nondeterministic logarithmic space.<ref name=":0">Immerman 1999, p. 242</ref> * First-order logic with a [[least fixed point]] operator gives [[P (complexity)|P]], the problems solvable in deterministic polynomial time.<ref name=":0" /> * Existential second-order logic yields [[NP (complexity)|NP]].<ref name=":0" /> * Universal second-order logic (excluding existential second-order quantification) yields [[co-NP]].<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|last=Fagin|first=Ron|title=Complexity of Computation|year=1974|editor-last=Karp|editor-first=Richard|pages=43{{mdash}}73|chapter=Generalized first-order spectra and polynomial-time recognizable sets}}</ref> * [[SO (complexity)|Second-order]] logic corresponds to [[PH (complexity)|the polynomial hierarchy PH]].<ref name=":0" /> * Second-order logic with a [[transitive closure]] (commutative or not) yields [[PSPACE]], the problems solvable in polynomial space.<ref>Immerman 1999, p. 243</ref> * Second-order logic with a [[least fixed point]] operator gives [[EXPTIME]], the problems solvable in exponential time.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Abiteboul|first1=Serge|last2=Vardi|first2=Moshe Y.|last3=Vianu|first3=Victor|date=1997-01-15|title=Fixpoint logics, relational machines, and computational complexity|journal=[[Journal of the ACM]]|language=en|volume=44|issue=1|pages=30–56|doi=10.1145/256292.256295|s2cid=11338470|issn=0004-5411|doi-access=free}}</ref> * [[HO (complexity)|HO]], the complexity class defined by [[higher-order logic]], is equal to [[ELEMENTARY]]<ref>{{Cite journal| first1 = Lauri|last1= Hella|first2 = José María|last2 = Turull-Torres | title =Computing queries with higher-order logics | journal =[[Theoretical Computer Science (journal)|Theoretical Computer Science]] | volume = 355 | issue = 2 | year = 2006 | pages = 197–214 | issn =0304-3975 | publisher =Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd. | place = Essex, UK | doi=10.1016/j.tcs.2006.01.009| doi-access = free }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)