Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Devadatta
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Scholarship == === Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya research === According to Andrew Skilton, modern scholarship generally agrees that the [[Mahāsāṃghika]] Vinaya is the oldest extant Buddhist [[Vinaya]].<ref name="autogenerated48">Skilton, Andrew. ''A Concise History of Buddhism.'' 2004. p. 48</ref> According to [[Reginald Ray]], the Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya mentions the figure of Devadatta, but in a way that is different from the vinayas of the [[Sthaviravāda]] branch. According to this study, the earliest Vinaya material common to all sects simply depicts Devadatta as a Buddhist saint who wishes for the monks to live a rigorous lifestyle.<ref>Ray, Reginald (1994). ''Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations''. p. 168. ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070727024142/http://www.dharmaocean.org/Portals/0/documents/pubs/Devadatta.pdf A condemned Saint: Devadatta]), used by permission of Oxford University Press</ref> This has led Ray to regard the story of Devadatta as a legend produced by the Sthavira group.<ref>Ray, Reginald (1994). ''Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations''. pp. 169–170. ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070727024142/http://www.dharmaocean.org/Portals/0/documents/pubs/Devadatta.pdf A condemned Saint: Devadatta]), used by permission of Oxford University Press</ref> However, as Bhikkhu Sujato has noted, the Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya does indeed contain material depicting Devadatta as a schismatic figure trying to split the [[sangha]] (monastic community). Sujato adds: "The only relevant difference is the grounds he is said to base his attempt on. Whereas the Sthavira Vinayas say he promulgated a set of ‘five points’, by which he tried to enforce an excessively ascetic lifestyle on the monks, the Mahāsaṅghika Vinaya omits the five points and attributes a much more comprehensive agenda to him."<ref name=":0">Bhikkhu Sujato (2012), ''[http://santifm.org/santipada/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/WhyDevadattaWasNoSaint.pdf "Why Devadatta Was No Saint, A critique of Reginald Ray’s thesis of the ‘condemned saint’"]'' </ref> Sujato further argues that "The fact that the Devadatta legend, at least the core episodes 13 and 14, is common to all six Vinayas including the Mahāsaṅghika suggests the legend arose among the presectarian community, and in all likelihood harks back to the time of the Buddha himself."<ref name=":0" /> === Records from Chinese pilgrims to India === [[Faxian]] and other Chinese pilgrims who travelled to India in the early centuries of the current era recorded the continued existence of "Gotamaka" buddhists, followers of Devadatta.<ref>{{cite book|last=Hien|first=Fa|author-link=Fa Xian |author2=tr. by James Legge|title=A Record of Buddhistic kingdoms; being an account by the Chinese monk Fa-Hien of his travels in India and Ceylon, A.D. 399–414, in search of the Buddhist books of discipline|url=https://archive.org/stream/recordofbuddhist00fahsuoft#page/n9/mode/2up|year=1886|publisher=The Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 62}}</ref> Gotamaka are also referred to in Pali texts of the second and fifth centuries of the current era. The followers of Devadatta are recorded to have honored all the Buddhas previous to Śākyamuni (Gautama Buddha), but not Śākyamuni himself. According to Faxian, [[Xuanzang]] and [[I Ching (monk)|Yijing]]'s writings, some people practised in a similar way and with the same books as common Buddhists, but followed the similar tapas and performed rituals to the past three buddhas and not Śākyamuni.<ref>[http://vip.book.sina.com.cn/book/chapter_60473_42254.html 佛教开创时期的一场被歪曲被遗忘了的“路线斗争”]</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)