Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Dorabella Cipher
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Proposed solutions == [[Eric Sams]], the musicologist, produced an interpretation in 1970.<ref>{{CiteQ|Q115626069}}</ref> His interpretation of the message is: {{blockquote| STARTS: LARKS! IT'S CHAOTIC, BUT A CLOAK OBSCURES MY NEW LETTERS, A, B [alpha, beta, ie Greek letters or alphabet] BELOW: I OWN THE DARK MAKES E. E. SIGH WHEN YOU ARE TOO LONG GONE. }} The length of this text is 109 letters (ignoring the parenthetic note on Greek), whereas the original text contains only 87 or 88 characters: Sams claimed the surplus letters are implied by phonetic shorthand. Javier Atance has suggested that the solution is not a text but a melody, the 8 different positions of the semicircles, turning clockwise, corresponding to the [[Scale (music)|notes of the scale]], and that each semicircle has 3 different levels corresponding to natural, flat or sharp notes. Tim S. Roberts claims a solution via a simple substitution cipher and offers a statistical justification:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://cryptologicfoundation.org/content/Educational-Programs/documents/Solving_the_Dorabella_Cipher_v2a.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2012-06-19 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130509204122/http://www.cryptologicfoundation.org/content/Educational-Programs/documents/Solving_the_Dorabella_Cipher_v2a.pdf |archivedate=2013-05-09 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://unsolvedproblems.org/S12frev.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2011-12-29 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120313000812/http://unsolvedproblems.org/S12frev.pdf |archivedate=2012-03-13 }}</ref> {{blockquote| P.S. Now droop beige weeds set in it β pure idiocy β one entire bed! Luigi Ccibunud luvβngly tuned liuto studo two. }} In December 2011, Canadian cryptographer enthusiast Richard Henderson claimed<ref>{{cite web|last=Henderson|first=Richard|title=Dorabella Solved|url=http://www.aerobushentertainment.com/crypto/index.php?topic=174.0|work=Ancient Cryptography|accessdate=19 December 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120317054900/http://www.aerobushentertainment.com/crypto/index.php?PHPSESSID=1a5ace6c33ee2f2b62ec10871938d7e4&topic=174.0|archive-date=17 March 2012|url-status=dead}}</ref> to have found the correct [[plaintext|clear text]], encoded once again as a simple substitution cipher (with two letters as nulls), although some details remain to be worked out. His solution would read: {{blockquote| whY AM I VERY SAD, BELLE. I SAG AS WE SEE ROSES DO. E.E. IS EVER FOND OF U, DORA. I kNOw I PeN ONE I LOVe. All Of My Affection. }} In July 2020, Wayne Packwood claimed in the journal ''[[Musical Opinion]]'' to have produced a complete decryption:<ref name="packwood">{{cite periodical|last=Packwood|first=Wayne|title=Elgar as cryptographer β Tuning and Turing|journal=Musical Opinion|volume=143|pages=34β37|year=2020|url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/2423815327|id={{ProQuest|2423815327}} }}</ref> {{blockquote|A WOMAN IS LIKE CHESS ONE HAS TO MAKE MANY SACRIFICES FOR ITS QUEEN IT IS VICTORY SHE COMMANDS NOT DO BETTER}} The secondary message below was identified as the word RATS, which Packwood believed was a playful acknowledgement from Sir Edward to the individual that broke his cipher. Packwood's method involved rearranging the cipher based on the position of several dots, which Packwood identified as representing a [[conductor's baton]], and then arbitrarily shifting the presumed values of each glyph independently until a message emerged. The logic behind the pattern of shifts is not explained.<ref name="packwood" /> In a 2023 study, Viktor Wase applied cipher-solving computer algorithms to the Dorabella cipher and discovered that it is unlikely to be a [[monoalphabetic substitution cipher]] in English or Latin. This was done by showing that these algorithms can solve ciphers that are as short as Dorabella, yet they fail to solve the Dorabella cipher. <ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wase |first=Viktor |date=2023-11-20 |title=Dorabella unMASCed β the Dorabella Cipher is not an English or Latin Mono-Alphabetical Substitution Cipher |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01611194.2023.2271466 |journal=Cryptologia |language=en |pages=1β10 |doi=10.1080/01611194.2023.2271466 |issn=0161-1194}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)