Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Earnshaw's theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== In electrostatics === Informally, the case of a point charge in an arbitrary static electric field is a simple consequence of [[Gauss's law]]. For a particle to be in a stable equilibrium, small perturbations ("pushes") on the particle in any direction should not break the equilibrium; the particle should "fall back" to its previous position. This means that the force field lines around the particle's equilibrium position should all point inward, toward that position. If all of the surrounding field lines point toward the equilibrium point, then the [[divergence]] of the field at that point must be negative (i.e. that point acts as a sink). However, Gauss's law says that the divergence of any possible electric force field is zero in free space. In mathematical notation, an electrical force {{math|'''F'''('''r''')}} deriving from a potential {{math|''U''('''r''')}} will always be divergenceless (satisfy [[Laplace's equation]]): <math display="block">\nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} = \nabla \cdot (-\nabla U) = -\nabla^2 U = 0.</math> Therefore, there are no local [[minimum|minima]] or [[maximum|maxima]] of the field potential in free space, only [[saddle point]]s. A stable equilibrium of the particle cannot exist and there must be an instability in some direction. This argument may not be sufficient if all the second derivatives of ''U'' are null''.''<ref>{{cite journal |last=Weinstock |first=Robert |date=1976 |title=On a fallacious proof of Earnshaw's theorem |journal=American Journal of Physics |volume=44 |issue=4 |pages=392β393 |doi=10.1119/1.10449|bibcode=1976AmJPh..44..392W }}</ref> To be completely rigorous, strictly speaking, the existence of a stable point does not require that all neighbouring force vectors point exactly toward the stable point; the force vectors could spiral in toward the stable point, for example. One method for dealing with this invokes the fact that, in addition to the divergence, the [[curl (mathematics)|curl]] of any electric field in free space is also zero (in the absence of any magnetic currents).
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)