Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Free software
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== {{anchor|Naming}}Naming and differences with open source === {{Main|Alternative terms for free software}} Although both definitions refer to almost equivalent corpora of programs, the Free Software Foundation recommends using the term "free software" rather than "[[open-source software]]" (an alternative, yet similar, concept coined in 1998), because the goals and messaging are quite dissimilar. According to the Free Software Foundation, "Open source" and its associated campaign mostly focus on the technicalities of the [[Open-source model|public development model]] and marketing free software to businesses, while taking the ethical issue of user rights very lightly or even antagonistically.<ref name="misses-the-point" /> Stallman has also stated that considering the practical advantages of free software is like considering the practical advantages of not being handcuffed, in that it is not necessary for an individual to consider practical reasons in order to realize that being handcuffed is undesirable in itself.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/practical.html |title=The advantages of free software |author-link=Richard Stallman |first=Richard |last=Stallman |publisher=[[Free Software Foundation]] |date=2013-05-14 |access-date=2013-08-12}}</ref> The FSF also notes that "Open Source" has exactly one specific meaning in common English, namely that "you can look at the source code." It states that while the term "Free Software" can lead to two different interpretations, at least one of them is consistent with the intended meaning unlike the term "Open Source".{{efn|[[Source-available software|Access to source code]] is a necessary but insufficient condition, according to both the Free Software and Open Source definitions.}} The loan adjective "[[wikt:libre|libre]]" is often used to avoid the ambiguity of the word "free" in the [[English language]], and the ambiguity with the older usage of "free software" as public-domain software.<ref name="infoworld1983" /> (''See [[Gratis versus libre]].'')
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)