Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Gender neutrality in English
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Support for=== Supporters of gender-neutral language argue that the use of gender-specific language often implies male superiority or reflects an unequal state of society.<ref>{{harvp|Spender|1980|p=x}}</ref><ref>{{harvp|Miller|Swift|1988|pp=45, 64, 66}}</ref> According to ''The Handbook of English Linguistics'', generic masculine pronouns and gender-specific job titles are instances "where English linguistic convention has historically treated men as prototypical of the human species."<ref name="handbook linguistics">Aarts, Bas and April M. S. McMahon. [https://books.google.com/books?id=tzyAyl1retcC&pg=PA737 ''The Handbook of English Linguistics.''] Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Pub., 2006, {{ISBN|978-1-4051-1382-3}}.</ref> That masculine forms are used to represent all human beings is in accord with the traditional gender hierarchy, which grants men more power and higher social status than women.<ref name="Prewitt-Freilino, Gendering">{{Cite journal |last1=Prewitt-Freilino |first1=J.L. |last2=Caswell |first2=T.A. |last3=Laakso |first3=E.K. |title=The Gendering of Language: A Comparison of Gender Equality in Countries with Gendered, Natural Gender, and Genderless Languages. |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0083-5 |journal=Sex Roles |year=2012 |volume=66 |issue=3β4 |pages=268β281 |publisher=SpringerLink |doi=10.1007/s11199-011-0083-5 |s2cid=145066913 |access-date=14 March 2022|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Supporters also argue that words that refer to women often devolve in meaning, frequently developing sexual overtones.<ref>{{harvp|Spender|1980|p=18}}</ref> ''[[The Handbook of Nonsexist Writing]]'' says that the words children hear affect their perceptions of the gender-appropriateness of certain [[career]]s (e.g. firemen vs firefighters).<ref name="Miller and Swift 1988">{{harvp|Miller|Swift|1988}}</ref> Men and women apply for jobs in more equal proportions when gender-neutral language is used in the advertisement, as opposed to the generic ''he'' or ''man''.<ref name="Mills 1995">{{harvp|Mills|1995}}</ref> Some critics claim that these differences in usage are not accidental, but have been deliberately created for the purpose of upholding a [[Patriarchy|patriarchal society]].<ref>{{harvp|Spender|1980|pp=1-6}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)