Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Goose barnacle
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Spontaneous generation == {{main|Barnacle goose myth}} [[File:PSM V04 D585 The goose tree.jpg|thumb|upright|"The goose-tree" from [[John Gerard|Gerard's]] ''Herbal'' (1597), displaying the belief that goose barnacles produced barnacle geese.]] In the days before [[bird]]s were known to [[bird migration|migrate]], [[barnacle geese]], ''Branta leucopsis'', were thought to have developed from this crustacean through [[spontaneous generation]], since they were never seen to [[nest]] in temperate Europe,<ref name="Allaby">{{cite book |author=Michael Allaby |year=2009 |title=Animals: from Mythology to Zoology |publisher=[[Infobase Publishing]] |isbn=978-0-8160-6101-3 |chapter=Barnacles |pages=75β77 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KtKZ12YN9qcC&pg=PT91}}</ref> hence the [[English language|English]] names "goose barnacle" and "barnacle goose", and the scientific name ''[[Lepas anserifera]]'' ({{langx|la|[[:wikt:anser|anser]]}}, "goose"). The confusion was prompted by their similarities in colour and shape. Because they were often found on [[driftwood]], the barnacles were assumed to be attached to branches before they fell in the water. The [[archdeacon]] of [[Brecon]], [[Gerald of Wales]], made this claim in his ''[[Topographia Hiberniae]]''.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Beatrice White |year=1945 |title=Whale-hunting, the barnacle goose, and the date of the "Ancrene Riwle". Three notes on Old and Middle English |journal=[[The Modern Language Review]] |volume=40 |issue=3 |pages=205β207 |doi=10.2307/3716844 |jstor=3716844}}</ref> Since barnacle geese were thought to be "neither flesh, nor born of flesh", they were allowed to be eaten on [[Meat-free day|days when eating meat was forbidden]] by some [[Christianity|Christian churches]],<ref name="Allaby"/> though it was not universally accepted. [[Holy Roman Emperor]] [[Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor|Frederick II]] examined barnacles and noted no evidence of any bird-like embryo in them, and the secretary of [[Lev of Rozmital]] wrote a very skeptical account of his reaction to being served the goose at a fast-day dinner in 1456.<ref>Henisch, Bridget Ann, ''Fast and Feast: Food in Medieval Society.'' The Pennsylvania State Press, University Park. 1976. {{ISBN|0-271-01230-7}}, pp. 48β49.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)