Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Hadamard matrix
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Proof=== The [[mathematical proof|proof]] of the nonexistence of Hadamard matrices with dimensions other than 1, 2, or a multiple of 4 follows: If <math>n>1</math>, then there is at least one scalar product of 2 rows which has to be 0. The scalar product is a sum of ''n'' values each of which is either 1 or β1, therefore the sum is [[parity (mathematics)|odd]] for odd ''n'', so ''n'' must be [[parity (mathematics)|even]]. If <math>n = 4 m + 2</math> with <math>m \geq 1</math>, and there exists an <math>n \times n</math> Hadamard matrix <math>H = (h_{i,j})_{i,j \in \{0,1,...,n-1\}}</math>, then it has the property that for any <math>k \neq l</math>: :<math>\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} h_{k,i} h_{l,i} = 0</math> Now we define the matrix <math>A = (a_{i,j})_{i,j \in \{0,1,...,n-1\}}</math> by setting <math>a_{i,j} = h_{0,j}h_{i,j}</math>. Note that <math>A</math> has all 1s in row 0. We check that <math>A</math> is also a Hadamard matrix: :<math>\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a_{k,i} a_{l,i} = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} h_{0,j} h_{k,i} h_{0,j} h_{l,i} = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} h_{0,j}^2 h_{k,i} h_{l,i} = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} h_{k,i} h_{l,i} = 0.</math> Row 1 and row 2, like all other rows except row 0, must have <math>n/2</math> entries of 1 and <math>n/2</math> entries of β1 each. (*) Let <math>\alpha</math> denote the number of 1s of row 2 beneath 1s in row 1. Let <math>\beta</math> denote the number of β1s of row 2 beneath 1s in row 1. Let <math>\gamma</math> denote the number of 1s of row 2 beneath β1s in row 1. Let <math>\delta</math> denote the number of β1s of row 2 beneath β1s in row 1. Row 2 has to be orthogonal to row 1, so the number of products of entries of the rows resulting in 1, <math>\alpha + \delta</math>, has to match those resulting in β1, <math>\beta + \gamma</math>. Due to (*), we also have <math>n/2 = \alpha + \gamma = \beta + \delta</math>, from which we can express <math>\gamma = n/2 - \alpha</math> and <math>\delta = n/2 - \beta</math> and substitute: :<math>\alpha + \delta = \beta + \gamma</math> :<math>\alpha + \frac{n}{2} - \beta = \beta + \frac{n}{2} - \alpha</math> :<math>\alpha - \beta = \beta - \alpha</math> :<math>\alpha = \beta</math> But we have as the number of 1s in row 1 the odd number <math>n/2 = \alpha + \beta</math>, [[proof by contradiction|contradiction]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)