Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Highly composite number
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Prime factorization== [[File:Highly_composite_numbers.svg|thumb|250px|Plot of the number of divisors of integers from 1 to 1000. Highly composite numbers are labelled in bold and superior highly composite numbers are starred. In the [//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/Highly_composite_numbers.svg SVG file], hover over a bar to see its statistics.]] Roughly speaking, for a number to be highly composite it has to have [[prime factors]] as small as possible, but not too many of the same. By the [[fundamental theorem of arithmetic]], every positive integer ''n'' has a unique prime factorization: :<math>n = p_1^{c_1} \times p_2^{c_2} \times \cdots \times p_k^{c_k}</math> where <math>p_1 < p_2 < \cdots < p_k</math> are prime, and the exponents <math>c_i</math> are positive integers. Any factor of n must have the same or lesser multiplicity in each prime: :<math>p_1^{d_1} \times p_2^{d_2} \times \cdots \times p_k^{d_k}, 0 \leq d_i \leq c_i, 0 < i \leq k</math> So the number of divisors of ''n'' is: :<math>d(n) = (c_1 + 1) \times (c_2 + 1) \times \cdots \times (c_k + 1).</math> Hence, for a highly composite number ''n'', * the ''k'' given prime numbers ''p''<sub>''i''</sub> must be precisely the first ''k'' prime numbers (2, 3, 5, ...); if not, we could replace one of the given primes by a smaller prime, and thus obtain a smaller number than ''n'' with the same number of divisors (for instance 10 = 2 × 5 may be replaced with 6 = 2 × 3; both have four divisors); * the sequence of exponents must be non-increasing, that is <math>c_1 \geq c_2 \geq \cdots \geq c_k</math>; otherwise, by exchanging two exponents we would again get a smaller number than ''n'' with the same number of divisors (for instance 18 = 2<sup>1</sup> Γ 3<sup>2</sup> may be replaced with 12 = 2<sup>2</sup> Γ 3<sup>1</sup>; both have six divisors). Also, except in two special cases ''n'' = 4 and ''n'' = 36, the last exponent ''c''<sub>''k''</sub> must equal 1. It means that 1, 4, and 36 are the only square highly composite numbers. Saying that the sequence of exponents is non-increasing is equivalent to saying that a highly composite number is a product of [[primorials]] or, alternatively, the smallest number for its [[prime signature]]. Note that although the above described conditions are necessary, they are not sufficient for a number to be highly composite. For example, 96 = 2<sup>5</sup> Γ 3 satisfies the above conditions and has 12 divisors but is not highly composite since there is a smaller number (60) which has the same number of divisors.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)