Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Hittite language
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Classification== Hittite is one of the Anatolian languages and is known from [[Hittite cuneiform|cuneiform]] tablets and inscriptions that were erected by the Hittite kings. The script formerly known as "Hieroglyphic Hittite" is now termed Hieroglyphic Luwian. The Anatolian branch also includes [[Cuneiform Luwian]], [[Hieroglyphic Luwian]], [[Palaic language|Palaic]], [[Lycian language|Lycian]], [[Milyan language|Milyan]], [[Lydian language|Lydian]], [[Carian language|Carian]], [[Pisidian language|Pisidian]], [[Sidetic language|Sidetic]] and [[Isaurian language|Isaurian]].<ref>Kloekhorst, Alwin. "[https://www.academia.edu/86912968/Anatolian_2022_ Anatolian]". In: ''The Indo-European Language Family: A Phylogenetic Perspective''. Edited by Thomas Olander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. pp. 63β65. {{doi|10.1017/9781108758666.005}}.</ref> Unlike most other Indo-European languages, Hittite does not distinguish between masculine and feminine grammatical gender, and it lacks subjunctive and [[optative mood]]s as well as aspect. Various hypotheses have been formulated to explain these differences.<ref>{{harvnb|Melchert|2012|pp=2β5}}.</ref> Some [[linguists]], most notably [[Edgar H. Sturtevant]] and [[Warren Cowgill]], have argued that Hittite should be classified as a [[sister language]] to [[Proto-Indo-European]], rather than as a [[daughter language]]. Their [[Indo-Hittite]] hypothesis is that the parent language (Indo-Hittite) lacked the features that are absent in Hittite as well, and that Proto-Indo-European later innovated them. Other linguists, however, prefer the ''Schwund'' ("loss") Hypothesis in which Hittite (or Anatolian) came from Proto-Indo-European, with its full range of features, but the features became simplified in Hittite. According to [[Craig Melchert]], the current tendency (as of 2012) is to suppose that Proto-Indo-European evolved and that the "prehistoric speakers" of Anatolian became isolated "from the rest of the PIE speech community, so as not to share in some common innovations".<ref>{{harvnb|Melchert|2012|p=7}}.</ref> Hittite and the other [[Anatolian languages]] split off from [[Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] at an early stage. Hittite thus preserved archaisms that would be lost in the other Indo-European languages.<ref>{{harvnb|Jasanoff|2003|p=20 with footnote 41}}</ref> Hittite has many loanwords, particularly religious vocabulary from the non-Indo-European [[Hurrian language|Hurrian]] and [[Hattic language|Hattic]] languages. The latter was the language of the [[Hattians]], the local inhabitants of the land of [[Hattians|Hatti]] before they were absorbed or displaced by the [[Hittites]]. Sacred and magical texts from [[Hattusa]] were often written in Hattic, [[Hurrian]] and [[Luwian language|Luwian]] even after Hittite had become the norm for other writings.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)