Editing Human Accomplishment (section)

== Analysis ==
According to Murray's analysis, accomplishment has not been uniformly distributed. For example, in Italian [[Renaissance]], accomplishment was concentrated in Florence and Venice. In the British Isles, around London, the industrial north, and lowland Scotland. Another result of his analysis was that most innovation has been accomplished by men, not women, and Europeans, not other ethnic and cultural groups.

There is a relationship between closeness to elite universities and human accomplishment (but not between non-elite universities and accomplishment). Furthermore, innovation is self-reinforcing: where there has been innovation, likely more will occur.

The book argued that streams of accomplishment are fostered by political regimes that give de facto freedom of action to their potential artists and scholars. This means freedom of expression and innovation. It does not necessarily mean democracy although [[totalitarianism]] suppressed innovation. War and civil unrest did not affect innovation.

Religious liberty increased innovation. Jews had "sparse representation in European arts and sciences through the beginning of the 19C", but within a century Jews were disproportionately represented (except in astronomy). This coincided with the emancipation of Jews who earlier had been denied legal rights and access to universities and public office.

The highest scoring woman in a category was [[Murasaki Shikibu]] among Japanese literature. The highest in western literature was [[Virginia Woolf]]. The highest in science was [[Marie Curie]].