Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Illusory correlation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Example== David Hamilton and Robert Gifford (1976) conducted a series of experiments that demonstrated how stereotypic beliefs regarding minorities could derive from illusory correlation processes.<ref name="HamiltonGifford1976">{{cite journal|last1=Hamilton|first1=D|last2=Gifford|first2=R|title=Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments|journal=Journal of Experimental Social Psychology|volume=12|issue=4|year=1976|pages=392β407|doi=10.1016/S0022-1031(76)80006-6}}</ref> To test their hypothesis, Hamilton and Gifford had research participants read a series of sentences describing either desirable or undesirable behaviors, which were attributed to either Group A (the majority) or Group B (the minority).<ref name="Whitley">{{Harvnb|Whitley|Kite|2010}}</ref> Abstract groups were used so that no previously established stereotypes would influence results. Most of the sentences were associated with Group A, and the remaining few were associated with Group B.<ref name="HamiltonGifford1976" /> The following table summarizes the information given. {| class="wikitable" align="right" |- ! Behaviors !! Group A (majority) !! Group B (minority) !! Total |- | Desirable || 18 (69%) || 9 (69%) || 27 |- | Undesirable || 8 (30%) || 4 (30%) || 12 |- | Total || 26 || 13 || 39 |- |} Each group had the same proportions of positive and negative behaviors, so there was no real association between behaviors and group membership. Results of the study show that positive, desirable behaviors were not seen as distinctive so people were accurate in their associations. On the other hand, when distinctive, undesirable behaviors were represented in the sentences, the participants overestimated how much the minority group exhibited the behaviors.<ref name="HamiltonGifford1976" /> A parallel effect occurs when people judge whether two events, such as pain and bad weather, are correlated. They rely heavily on the relatively small number of cases where the two events occur together. People pay relatively little attention to the other kinds of observation (of no pain or good weather).<ref name="Kunda127">{{Harvnb|Kunda|1999|pp=127β130}}</ref><ref name="Plous162">{{Harvnb|Plous|1993|pp=162β164}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)