Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Intransitivity
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Antitransitivity == Antitransitivity for a relation says that the transitive condition does not hold for any three values. In the example above, the {{em|feed on}} relation is not transitive, but it still contains some transitivity: for instance, humans feed on rabbits, rabbits feed on carrots, and humans also feed on carrots. A relation is {{em|antitransitive}} if this never occurs at all. The formal definition is: <math display=block>\forall a, b, c: a R b \land b R c \implies \lnot (a R c).</math> For example, the relation ''R'' on the integers, such that ''a R b'' if and only if ''a + b'' is odd, is intransitive. If ''a R b'' and ''b R c'', then either ''a'' and ''c'' are both odd and ''b'' is even, or vice-versa. In either case, ''a + c'' is even. A second example of an antitransitive relation: the ''defeated'' relation in [[knockout tournament]]s. If player A defeated player B and player B defeated player C, A can have never played C, and therefore, A has not defeated C. By [[Transposition (logic)|transposition]], each of the following formulas is equivalent to antitransitivity of ''R'': <math display=block>\begin{align} &\forall a, b, c: a R b \land a R c \implies \lnot (b R c) \\[3pt] &\forall a, b, c: a R c \land b R c \implies \lnot (a R b) \end{align}</math> ===Properties=== * An antitransitive relation is always [[Irreflexive relation|irreflexive]]. * An antitransitive relation on a set of β₯4 elements is never [[Connex relation|connex]]. On a 3-element set, the depicted cycle has both properties. * An irreflexive and [[Left-unique relation|left-]] (or [[Right-unique relation|right-]]) unique relation is always anti-transitive.<ref>If ''aRb'', ''bRc'', and ''aRc'' would hold for some ''a'', ''b'', ''c'', then {{math|1=''a'' = ''b''}} by left uniqueness, contradicting ''aRb'' by irreflexivity.</ref> An example of the former is the ''mother'' relation. If ''A'' is the mother of ''B'', and ''B'' the mother of ''C'', then ''A'' cannot be the mother of ''C''. * If a relation ''R'' is antitransitive, so is each subset of ''R''.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)